» Articles » PMID: 28424527

Unified Alignment of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Apr 21
PMID 28424527
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Paralleling the increasing availability of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network data, several network alignment methods have been proposed. Network alignments have been used to uncover functionally conserved network parts and to transfer annotations. However, due to the computational intractability of the network alignment problem, aligners are heuristics providing divergent solutions and no consensus exists on a gold standard, or which scoring scheme should be used to evaluate them. We comprehensively evaluate the alignment scoring schemes and global network aligners on large scale PPI data and observe that three methods, HUBALIGN, L-GRAAL and NATALIE, regularly produce the most topologically and biologically coherent alignments. We study the collective behaviour of network aligners and observe that PPI networks are almost entirely aligned with a handful of aligners that we unify into a new tool, Ulign. Ulign enables complete alignment of two networks, which traditional global and local aligners fail to do. Also, multiple mappings of Ulign define biologically relevant soft clusterings of proteins in PPI networks, which may be used for refining the transfer of annotations across networks. Hence, PPI networks are already well investigated by current aligners, so to gain additional biological insights, a paradigm shift is needed. We propose such a shift come from aligning all available data types collectively rather than any particular data type in isolation from others.

Citing Articles

Exact p-values for global network alignments via combinatorial analysis of shared GO terms : REFANGO: Rigorous Evaluation of Functional Alignments of Networks using Gene Ontology.

Hayes W J Math Biol. 2024; 88(5):50.

PMID: 38551701 PMC: 10980677. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-024-02058-z.


Overview of methods for characterization and visualization of a protein-protein interaction network in a multi-omics integration context.

Robin V, Bodein A, Scott-Boyer M, Leclercq M, Perin O, Droit A Front Mol Biosci. 2022; 9:962799.

PMID: 36158572 PMC: 9494275. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.962799.


BioAlign: An Accurate Global PPI Network Alignment Algorithm.

Ayub U, Naveed H Evol Bioinform Online. 2022; 18:11769343221110658.

PMID: 35898232 PMC: 9309777. DOI: 10.1177/11769343221110658.


Challenges and Limitations of Biological Network Analysis.

Milano M, Agapito G, Cannataro M BioTech (Basel). 2022; 11(3).

PMID: 35892929 PMC: 9326688. DOI: 10.3390/biotech11030024.


SANA: cross-species prediction of Gene Ontology GO annotations via topological network alignment.

Wang S, Atkinson G, Hayes W NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2022; 8(1):25.

PMID: 35859153 PMC: 9300714. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-022-00232-x.


References
1.
Seah B, Bhowmick S, Dewey Jr C . DualAligner: a dual alignment-based strategy to align protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(18):2619-26. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu358. View

2.
Gligorijevic V, Janjic V, Przulj N . Integration of molecular network data reconstructs Gene Ontology. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(17):i594-600. PMC: 4230235. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu470. View

3.
Kanehisa M, Goto S . KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 28(1):27-30. PMC: 102409. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. View

4.
Fields S, Song O . A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989; 340(6230):245-6. DOI: 10.1038/340245a0. View

5.
Przulj N . Protein-protein interactions: making sense of networks via graph-theoretic modeling. Bioessays. 2010; 33(2):115-23. DOI: 10.1002/bies.201000044. View