» Articles » PMID: 28424297

Magnitude and Behavior of Cross-talk Effects in Multichannel Electrophysiology Experiments

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2017 Apr 21
PMID 28424297
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Modern neurophysiological experiments frequently involve multiple channels separated by very small distances. A unique methodological concern for multiple-electrode experiments is that of capacitive coupling (cross-talk) between channels. Yet the nature of the cross-talk recording circuit is not well known in the field, and the extent to which it practically affects neurophysiology experiments has never been fully investigated. Here we describe a simple electrical circuit model of simultaneous recording and stimulation with two or more channels and experimentally verify the model using ex vivo brain slice and in vivo whole-brain preparations. In agreement with the model, we find that cross-talk amplitudes increase nearly linearly with the impedance of a recording electrode and are larger for higher frequencies. We demonstrate cross-talk contamination of action potential waveforms from intracellular to extracellular channels, which is observable in part because of the different orders of magnitude between the channels. This contamination is electrode impedance-dependent and matches predictions from the model. We use recently published parameters to simulate cross-talk in high-density multichannel extracellular recordings. Cross-talk effectively spatially smooths current source density (CSD) estimates in these recordings and induces artefactual phase shifts where underlying voltage gradients occur; however, these effects are modest. We show that the effects of cross-talk are unlikely to affect most conclusions inferred from neurophysiology experiments when both originating and receiving electrode record signals of similar magnitudes. We discuss other types of experiments and analyses that may be susceptible to cross-talk, techniques for detecting and experimentally reducing cross-talk, and implications for high-density probe design. We develop and experimentally verify an electrical circuit model describing cross-talk that necessarily occurs between two channels. Recorded cross-talk increased with electrode impedance and signal frequency. We recorded cross-talk contamination of spike waveforms from intracellular to extracellular channels. We simulated high-density multichannel extracellular recordings and demonstrate spatial smoothing and phase shifts that cross-talk enacts on CSD measurements. However, when channels record similar-magnitude signals, effects are modest and unlikely to affect most conclusions.

Citing Articles

Overcoming failure: improving acceptance and success of implanted neural interfaces.

Dalrymple A, Jones S, Fallon J, Shepherd R, Weber D Bioelectron Med. 2025; 11(1):6.

PMID: 40083033 PMC: 11907899. DOI: 10.1186/s42234-025-00168-7.


Parasitic Capacitance in High-Density Neural Electrode Arrays: Sources and Evaluation Methods.

Ghazavi A, Troyk P, Cogan S IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024; 72(2):794-802.

PMID: 39374275 PMC: 11875893. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3472708.


Suppression of crosstalk in multielectrode arrays with local shielding.

Naughton J, Varela J, Connolly T, Shepard S, Dodge T, Kempa K Front Nanotechnol. 2024; 4.

PMID: 39323942 PMC: 11423955. DOI: 10.3389/fnano.2022.948337.


Decrease in reaction time for volleyball athletes during saccadic eye movement task: A preliminary study with evoked potentials.

Costa E, Gongora M, Bittencourt J, Marinho V, Cagy M, Teixeira S PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0290142.

PMID: 38959207 PMC: 11221644. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290142.


Flexible circumferential bioelectronics to enable 360-degree recording and stimulation of the spinal cord.

Woodington B, Lei J, Carnicer-Lombarte A, Guemes-Gonzalez A, Naegele T, Hilton S Sci Adv. 2024; 10(19):eadl1230.

PMID: 38718109 PMC: 11078185. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl1230.


References
1.
Nelson M, Bosch C, Venance L, Pouget P . Microscale inhomogeneity of brain tissue distorts electrical signal propagation. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(7):2821-7. PMC: 6619221. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3502-12.2013. View

2.
Miceli S, Ness T, Einevoll G, Schubert D . Impedance Spectrum in Cortical Tissue: Implications for Propagation of LFP Signals on the Microscopic Level. eNeuro. 2017; 4(1). PMC: 5282548. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0291-16.2016. View

3.
Kilner J, Baker S, Lemon R . A novel algorithm to remove electrical cross-talk between surface EMG recordings and its application to the measurement of short-term synchronisation in humans. J Physiol. 2002; 538(Pt 3):919-30. PMC: 2290103. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012950. View

4.
Atallah B, Scanziani M . Instantaneous modulation of gamma oscillation frequency by balancing excitation with inhibition. Neuron. 2009; 62(4):566-77. PMC: 2702525. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.027. View

5.
Geddes L, da Costa C, Wise G . The impedance of stainless-steel electrodes. Med Biol Eng. 1971; 9(5):511-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02474708. View