Assessing Human Brain Impedance Using Simultaneous Surface and Intracerebral Recordings
Overview
Affiliations
Most of the literature on the brain impedance proposes a frequency-independent resistive model. Recently, this conclusion was tackled by a series of papers (Bédard et al., 2006; Bédard and Destexhe, 2009; Gomes et al., 2016), based on microscopic sale modeling and measurements. Our paper aims to investigate the impedance issue using simultaneous in vivo depth and surface signals recorded during intracerebral electrical stimulation of epileptic patients, involving a priori different tissues with different impedances. Our results confirm the conclusions from Logothethis et al. (2007): there is no evidence of frequency dependence of the brain tissue impedance (more precisely, there is no difference, in terms of frequency filtering, between the brain and the skull bone), at least at a macroscopic scale. In order to conciliate findings from both microscopic and macroscopic scales, we recall different neural/synaptic current generators' models from the literature and we propose an original computational model, based on fractional dynamics.
Lee S, Hahn C, Seong E, Choi H Biosens Bioelectron. 2025; 273:117181.
PMID: 39832406 PMC: 11868995. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.117181.
Piastra M, Oostenveld R, Homolle S, Han B, Chen Q, Oostendorp T Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1279183.
PMID: 38410258 PMC: 10894995. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1279183.
Herreras O, Torres D, Makarov V, Makarova J Front Cell Neurosci. 2023; 17:1129097.
PMID: 37066073 PMC: 10097999. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1129097.
Computing Extracellular Electric Potentials from Neuronal Simulations.
Ness T, Halnes G, Naess S, Pettersen K, Einevoll G Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022; 1359:179-199.
PMID: 35471540 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89439-9_8.
Why Should Natural Principles Be Simple?.
Tozzi A Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2021; 50(1):321-335.
PMID: 33879931 PMC: 8051000. DOI: 10.1007/s11406-021-00359-x.