» Articles » PMID: 28396863

Real-Time Ultrasound/MRI Fusion for Suprasacral Parallel Shift Approach to Lumbosacral Plexus Blockade and Analysis of Injectate Spread: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Fused real-time ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to improve the accuracy of advanced image guided procedures. However, its use in regional anesthesia is practically nonexistent. In this randomized controlled crossover trial, we aim to explore effectiveness, procedure-related outcomes, injectate spread analyzed by MRI, and safety of ultrasound/MRI fusion versus ultrasound guided Suprasacral Parallel Shift (SSPS) technique for lumbosacral plexus blockade. Twenty-six healthy subjects aged 21-36 years received two SSPS blocks (20 mL 2% lidocaine-epinephrine [1 : 200,000] added 1 mL diluted contrast) guided by ultrasound/MRI fusion versus ultrasound. Number (proportion) of subjects with motor blockade of the femoral and obturator nerves and the lumbosacral trunk was equal (ultrasound/MRI, 23/26 [88%]; ultrasound, 23/26 [88%]; = 1.00). Median (interquartile range) preparation and procedure times (s) were longer for the ultrasound/MRI fusion guided technique (686 [552-1023] versus 196 [167-228], < 0.001 and 333 [254-439] versus 216 [176-294], = 0.001). Both techniques produced perineural spread and corresponding sensory analgesia from L2 to S1. Epidural spread and lidocaine pharmacokinetics were similar. Different compartmentalized patterns of injectate spread were observed. Ultrasound/MRI fusion guided SSPS was equally effective and safe but required prolonged time, compared to ultrasound guided SSPS. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2013-004013-41) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02593370).

Citing Articles

Circum-Psoas Block versus Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zheng J, Mi Y, Liang J, Li H, Shao P, Wen H J Pain Res. 2023; 16:3961-3970.

PMID: 38026457 PMC: 10675663. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S435159.


Evaluation of Sensory Loss Obtained by Circum-Psoas Blocks in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: A Descriptive Pilot Study.

Li H, Shi R, Shao P, Wang Y J Pain Res. 2022; 15:827-835.

PMID: 35378731 PMC: 8976501. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S354829.


Depth of cervical plexus block and phrenic nerve blockade: a randomized trial.

Opperer M, Kaufmann R, Meissnitzer M, Enzmann F, Dinges C, Hitzl W Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022; 47(4):205-211.

PMID: 35012992 PMC: 8867263. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102851.


Development of Guidance Techniques for Regional Anesthesia: Past, Present and Future.

Wu Z, Wang Y J Pain Res. 2021; 14:1631-1641.

PMID: 34135627 PMC: 8200162. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S316743.


Real-time ultrasound-computed tomography image fusion for transforaminal lumbar approach: a lumbosacral spine phantoms study.

Emmanuel G, Arnaud P, Jonathan G, Marie R, Iulia M, Sanjiva P Eur Spine J. 2021; 30(5):1270-1276.

PMID: 33713176 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06794-4.

References
1.
Karmakar M, Li J, Kwok W, Soh E, Hadzic A . Sonoanatomy relevant for lumbar plexus block in volunteers correlated with cross-sectional anatomic and magnetic resonance images. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013; 38(5):391-7. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31829e52cc. View

2.
de Visme V, Picart F, Le Jouan R, Legrand A, Savry C, Morin V . Combined lumbar and sacral plexus block compared with plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for hip fractures in the elderly. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000; 25(2):158-62. DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2000.0250158. View

3.
Ehlers L, Jensen J, Bendtsen T . Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound vs nerve stimulation guidance for continuous sciatic nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109(5):804-8. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes259. View

4.
Chayen D, Nathan H, CHAYEN M . The psoas compartment block. Anesthesiology. 1976; 45(1):95-9. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197607000-00019. View

5.
Klauser A, De Zordo T, Feuchtner G, Djedovic G, Bellmann Weiler R, Faschingbauer R . Fusion of real-time US with CT images to guide sacroiliac joint injection in vitro and in vivo. Radiology. 2010; 256(2):547-53. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10090968. View