Regional Anaesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery is Associated with Significantly More Peri-operative Complications Compared with General Anaesthesia

Overview

Journal Int Orthop

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2015 Mar 24

PMID 25797416

Citations 17

Authors

Paul S Whiting

Cesar S Molina

Sarah E Greenberg

Rachel V Thakore

William T Obremskey

Manish K Sethi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Although several studies have advocated the use of regional versus general anaesthesia as a means of reducing peri-operative complications from hip fracture surgery, the ideal method of anaesthesia remains controversial. Our purpose was to investigate the association between anaesthesia type and peri-operative complications in hip fracture surgery.

Methods: From the 2005-2011 ACS-NSQIP database, all patients with operatively treated hip fractures were identified using CPT codes, and fifteen peri-operative complications were recorded and categorized as either minor or major. Rates of minor, major, and total complications by anaesthesia type were compared using chi-square and Fischer's exact tests. A multivariate model was used to determine odds of minor, major, and total complications between anaesthesia types. Multivariate analysis was then repeated after combining patients who received regional nerve blocks or spinal anaesthesia.

Results: A total of 7,764 hip fracture patients were included in our analysis. Spinal anaesthesia had the highest total complication rate (19.6%), followed by general (17.9%) and regional nerve blocks (12.6%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that spinal anaesthesia was associated with significantly greater odds of minor complications and total complications compared with general anaesthesia. After combining the regional nerve block and spinal anaesthesia groups, multivariate analysis again showed significantly greater odds of minor and total complications with regional versus general anaesthesia.

Conclusions: Using a large multi-centre database, we demonstrate that regional anaesthesia was associated with significantly greater odds of minor and total peri-operative complications compared with general anaesthesia. Our results challenge the notion that regional anaesthesia is the preferred method of anaesthesia for hip fractures in the elderly.

Citing Articles

Defining optimal orthogeriatric hip fracture care: a delphi consensus approach.

van Bremen H, Seppala L, Gans E, Hegeman J, van der Velde N, Willems H Eur Geriatr Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39909977 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-025-01156-5.

Predictive value of preoperative Fried Frailty Phenotype assessment and serum biomarkers on the prognosis of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture under general anesthesia within 3 months after surgery.

Xu F, Kuang X, Cao B, Yue Y Turk J Med Sci. 2024; 54(5):1043-1051.

PMID: 39473750 PMC: 11518330. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5883.

Comparing perioperative outcomes between regional anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu S, Chen J, Shi H, Li J, Zeng G, Liu W Can J Anaesth. 2024; 71(6):849-869.

PMID: 38418761 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-024-02696-3.

Clinical Characteristics of Spinal versus General Anaesthesia in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Repair Surgery in Jordan: A Multicentre Study.

Al-Husinat L, Al Sharie S, Araydah M, Al Modanat Z, Ismail M, Heilat H J Pers Med. 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38003926 PMC: 10672458. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13111611.

Reduced Concentrations of NSE, S100, A, and Proinflammatory Cytokines in Elderly Patients Receiving Ultrasound-Guided Combined Lumbar Plexus-Sciatic Nerve Block during Hip Replacement.

Zhang Y, Jiang L, Han Y Genet Res (Camb). 2022; 2022:1384609.

PMID: 35356751 PMC: 8933066. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1384609.

References

Longo S . Regional versus general anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006; 13(5):539-43. DOI: 10.1097/00001503-200010000-00009. View

Svartling N, Lehtinen A, TARKKANEN L . The effect of anaesthesia on changes in blood pressure and plasma cortisol levels induced by cementation with methylmethacrylate. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1986; 30(3):247-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02406.x. View

Radcliff T, Henderson W, Stoner T, Khuri S, Dohm M, Hutt E . Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(1):34-42. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00065. View

Neuman M, Silber J, Elkassabany N, Ludwig J, Fleisher L . Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology. 2012; 117(1):72-92. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182545e7c. View

Parsons H, Henderson W, Ziegenfuss J, Davern M, Al-Refaie W . Missing data and interpretation of cancer surgery outcomes at the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 213(3):379-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.010. View

Koval , ZUCKERMAN . Hip Fractures: I. Overview and Evaluation and Treatment of Femoral-Neck Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994; 2(3):141-149. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199405000-00002. View

White S, Moppett I, Griffiths R . Outcome by mode of anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery. An observational audit of 65 535 patients in a national dataset. Anaesthesia. 2014; 69(3):224-30. DOI: 10.1111/anae.12542. View

Pugely A, Martin C, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S, Callaghan J . Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 95(3):193-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01682. View

Luger T, Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Luger M, Kammerlander-Knauer U, Roth T . Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter?. Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21(Suppl 4):S555-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1399-7. View

10.

Cooper C, Campion G, Melton 3rd L . Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992; 2(6):285-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01623184. View

11.

Jones M, Piggott S, Vaughan R, Bayer A, Newcombe R, Twining T . Cognitive and functional competence after anaesthesia in patients aged over 60: controlled trial of general and regional anaesthesia for elective hip or knee replacement. BMJ. 1990; 300(6741):1683-7. PMC: 1663336. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6741.1683. View

12.

Suleiman L, Ortega G, Onguti S, Gonzalez D, Tran D, Onyike A . Does BMI affect perioperative complications following total knee and hip arthroplasty?. J Surg Res. 2011; 174(1):7-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.057. View

13.

Covert C, Fox G . Anaesthesia for hip surgery in the elderly. Can J Anaesth. 1989; 36(3 Pt 1):311-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF03010771. View

14.

Le-Wendling L, Bihorac A, Baslanti T, Lucas S, Sadasivan K, Wendling A . Regional anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia for surgery in geriatric patients with hip fracture: does it decrease morbidity, mortality, and health care costs? Results of a single-centered study. Pain Med. 2012; 13(7):948-56. PMC: 3730262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01402.x. View

15.

Egol K, Strauss E . Perioperative considerations in geriatric patients with hip fracture: what is the evidence?. J Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23(6):386-94. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181761502. View

16.

Schneider E, Guralnik J . The aging of America. Impact on health care costs. JAMA. 1990; 263(17):2335-40. View

17.

Parker M, Handoll H, Griffiths R . Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (4):CD000521. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000521.pub2. View

18.

Lyons A . Clinical outcomes and treatment of hip fractures. Am J Med. 1997; 103(2A):51S-63S; discussion 63S-64S. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)90027-9. View

19.

Hamilton B, Ko C, Richards K, Hall B . Missing data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are not missing at random: implications and potential impact on quality assessments. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210(2):125-139.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.021. View

20.

Urwin S, Parker M, Griffiths R . General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 84(4):450-5. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013468. View