» Articles » PMID: 28388616

The Evolution of Sex-linked Barring Alleles in Chickens Involves Both Regulatory and Coding Changes in CDKN2A

Abstract

Sex-linked barring is a fascinating plumage pattern in chickens recently shown to be associated with two non-coding and two missense mutations affecting the ARF transcript at the CDKN2A tumor suppressor locus. It however remained a mystery whether all four mutations are indeed causative and how they contribute to the barring phenotype. Here, we show that Sex-linked barring is genetically heterogeneous, and that the mutations form three functionally different variant alleles. The B0 allele carries only the two non-coding changes and is associated with the most dilute barring pattern, whereas the B1 and B2 alleles carry both the two non-coding changes and one each of the two missense mutations causing the Sex-linked barring and Sex-linked dilution phenotypes, respectively. The data are consistent with evolution of alleles where the non-coding changes occurred first followed by the two missense mutations that resulted in a phenotype more appealing to humans. We show that one or both of the non-coding changes are cis-regulatory mutations causing a higher CDKN2A expression, whereas the missense mutations reduce the ability of ARF to interact with MDM2. Caspase assays for all genotypes revealed no apoptotic events and our results are consistent with a recent study indicating that the loss of melanocyte progenitors in Sex-linked barring in chicken is caused by premature differentiation and not apoptosis. Our results show that CDKN2A is a major locus driving the differentiation of avian melanocytes in a temporal and spatial manner.

Citing Articles

Genomic and transcriptomic analyses unveil the genetic basis of green shank trait in small white-feather chickens.

Kong S, Cai X, Cai B, Xian Y, Zhou Z, Cai D Poult Sci. 2025; 104(4):104912.

PMID: 39985900 PMC: 11904536. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104912.


Low Mutation Load in a Supergene Underpinning Alternative Male Mating Strategies in Ruff (Calidris pugnax).

Hill J, Enbody E, Bi H, Lamichhaney S, Lei W, Chen J Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(12).

PMID: 37804117 PMC: 10700745. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad224.


Effects of SLC45A2 and GPNMB on Melanin Deposition Based on Transcriptome Sequencing in Chicken Feather Follicles.

Li R, Wang Y, Liu Y, Li D, Tian Y, Liu X Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(16).

PMID: 37627399 PMC: 10451703. DOI: 10.3390/ani13162608.


Comprehensive analysis of structural variants in chickens using PacBio sequencing.

Zhang J, Nie C, Li X, Zhao X, Jia Y, Han J Front Genet. 2022; 13:971588.

PMID: 36338955 PMC: 9632285. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.971588.


Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Candidate Genes for Stripe Pattern Feather Color of Rhode Island Red Chicks.

Shen Q, Zhou J, Li J, Zhao X, Zheng L, Bao H Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(9).

PMID: 36140679 PMC: 9498448. DOI: 10.3390/genes13091511.


References
1.
Hellstrom A, Sundstrom E, Gunnarsson U, BedHom B, Tixier-Boichard M, Honaker C . Sex-linked barring in chickens is controlled by the CDKN2A /B tumour suppressor locus. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2010; 23(4):521-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2010.00700.x. View

2.
Kannengiesser C, Dalle S, Leccia M, Avril M, Bonadona V, Chompret A . New founder germline mutations of CDKN2A in melanoma-prone families and multiple primary melanoma development in a patient receiving levodopa treatment. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007; 46(8):751-60. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20461. View

3.
Lamichhaney S, Berglund J, Almen M, Maqbool K, Grabherr M, Martinez-Barrio A . Evolution of Darwin's finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing. Nature. 2015; 518(7539):371-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature14181. View

4.
Nishimura E, Jordan S, Oshima H, Yoshida H, Osawa M, Moriyama M . Dominant role of the niche in melanocyte stem-cell fate determination. Nature. 2002; 416(6883):854-60. DOI: 10.1038/416854a. View

5.
Serbedzija G, Bronner-Fraser M, Fraser S . A vital dye analysis of the timing and pathways of avian trunk neural crest cell migration. Development. 1989; 106(4):809-16. DOI: 10.1242/dev.106.4.809. View