» Articles » PMID: 28385011

Pharmacokinetics of Tilmicosin in Healthy Pigs and in Pigs Experimentally Infected with

Overview
Journal J Vet Sci
Date 2017 Apr 8
PMID 28385011
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) study of tilmicosin (TIL) was conducted in 6 crossbred healthy pigs and 6 crossbred pigs infected with (.) following oral administration of a single 40 mg/kg dose. The infected model was established by intranasal inoculation and confirmed by clinical signs, blood biochemistry, and microscopic examinations. Plasma TIL concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection at 285 nm. PK parameters were calculated by using WinNonlin software. After TIL administration, the main PK parameters of TIL in healthy and -infected pigs were as follows: Area under the concentration-time curve, maximal drug concentration, half-life of the absorption phase, half-life of the distribution phase, and half-life of the elimination phase were 34.86 ± 9.69 28.73 ± 6.18 μgㆍh/mL, 1.77 ± 0.33 1.67 ± 0.28 μg/mL, 2.27 ± 0.45 2.24 ± 0.44 h, 5.35 ± 1.40 4.61 ± 0.35 h, and 43.53 ± 8.17 42.05 ± 9.36 h, respectively. These results of this exploratory study suggest that there were no significant differences between the PK profiles of TIL in the healthy and -infected pigs.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the Minimum Inhibitory and Mutant Prevention Drug Concentrations for Pradofloxacin and 7 Other Antimicrobial Agents Tested Against Swine Isolates of and .

Blondeau J, Fitch S Molecules. 2024; 29(22).

PMID: 39598838 PMC: 11597606. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29225448.


Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration of tilmicosin against in a piglet tissue cage model.

Chen Y, Ji X, Zhang S, Wang W, Zhang H, Ding H Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1260990.

PMID: 37732140 PMC: 10507324. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1260990.


Macrolide Resistance and Potentiation by Peptidomimetics in Porcine Clinical Escherichia coli.

Ma Y, Pirolo M, Subramani P, Gehring R, Damborg P, Franzyk H mSphere. 2022; 7(5):e0040222.

PMID: 36154672 PMC: 9599364. DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00402-22.


Computational Approaches in Preclinical Studies on Drug Discovery and Development.

Wu F, Zhou Y, Li L, Shen X, Chen G, Wang X Front Chem. 2020; 8:726.

PMID: 33062633 PMC: 7517894. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00726.


Efficacy of enteric-coated tilmicosin granules in pigs artificially infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2.

Dong Z, Zhou X, Sun J, Meng X, Li H, Cheng F Vet Med Sci. 2019; 6(1):105-113.

PMID: 31589010 PMC: 7036302. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.198.


References
1.
Modric S, Webb A, Davidson M . Effect of respiratory tract disease on pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin in rats. Lab Anim Sci. 1999; 49(3):248-53. View

2.
Ramadan A . Pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin in serum and milk of goats. Res Vet Sci. 1997; 62(1):48-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(97)90179-x. View

3.
Shen J, Li C, Jiang H, Zhang S, Guo P, Ding S . Pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin after oral administration in swine. Am J Vet Res. 2005; 66(6):1071-4. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1071. View

4.
Liu J, Fung K, Chen Z, Zeng Z, Zhang J . Pharmacokinetics of florfenicol in healthy pigs and in pigs experimentally infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47(2):820-3. PMC: 151723. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.820-823.2003. View

5.
Ayling R, Baker S, Peek M, Simon A, Nicholas R . Comparison of in vitro activity of danofloxacin, florfenicol, oxytetracycline, spectinomycin and tilmicosin against recent field isolates of Mycoplasma bovis. Vet Rec. 2000; 146(26):745-7. DOI: 10.1136/vr.146.26.745. View