Q-vector Measurements: Physical Examination Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements and Their Relationship with Tibial Tubercle-trochlear Groove Distance

Overview

Journal Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2017 Apr 6

PMID 28378138

Citations 8

Authors

Kristin H Graf

Marc A Tompkins

Julie Agel

Elizabeth A Arendt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: An increased lateral quadriceps vector has been associated with lateral patellar dislocation. Surgical correction of this increased vector through tibial tubercle medialization is often recommended when the quadriceps vector is "excessive". This can be evaluated by physical examination measurements of Q-angle and/or tubercle sulcus angle (TSA), as well as the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. This study examined the relationship between three objective measurements of lateral quadriceps vector (TT-TG, Q-angle, TSA). A secondary goal was to relate lateral patellar tilt to these measurements.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing patellofemoral stabilization surgery from 9/2010 to 6/2011 were included. The Q-angle and TSA were measured on intra-operative physical examination. The TT-TG and patellar tilt were measured on MRI. TSA, Q-angle, and patellar tilt were compared to TT-TG using Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: The study cohort included 49 patients, ages 12-37 (mean 23.2); 62% female. The Pearson correlation coefficients showed (+) significance (p < 0.01) between the TT-TG and both TSA and Q-angle. Tilt and TT-TG were (+) non-significantly correlated. Despite positive correlations of each measurement with TT-TG, there is not uniform intra-patient correlation. In other words, if TT-TG is elevated for a patient, it does not guarantee that all other measurements, including tilt, are elevated in that individual patient.

Conclusion: The TT-TG distance has significant positive correlation with the measurements of TSA and Q-angle in patients undergoing surgery for patellofemoral instability. The clinical relevance is that the variability within individual patients demonstrates the need for considering both TSA and TT-TG before and during surgical intervention to avoid overcorrection with a medial tibial tubercle osteotomy.

Level Of Evidence: Diagnostic study, Level III.

Citing Articles

Distal femoral osteotomy for the treatment of chronic patellofemoral instability improves gait patterns.

Rab P, Vieider R, Fritsch L, Cotic M, Imhoff F, Siebenlist S Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025; 145(1):176.

PMID: 40056196 PMC: 11890233. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-025-05788-x.

Epidemiology of Lateral Patellar Dislocation Including Bone Bruise Incidence: Five Years of Data from a Trauma Center.

Dai R, Wu Y, Jiang Y, Huang H, Meng Q, Shi W Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(2):437-443.

PMID: 38214094 PMC: 10834195. DOI: 10.1111/os.13933.

Association of Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance With Risk of ACL Graft Failure.

Chen K, Lee E, Kliethermes S, Scerpella T Orthop J Sports Med. 2023; 11(6):23259671231180860.

PMID: 37441506 PMC: 10333637. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231180860.

Anatomical Components Associated With Increased Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance.

Xu C, Cui Z, Yan L, Chen Z, Wang F Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(8):23259671221113841.

PMID: 36003969 PMC: 9393578. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221113841.

The patellofemoral morphology and the normal predicted value of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in the Chinese population.

Li Z, Liu G, Tian R, Kong N, Li Y, Li Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):575.

PMID: 34162383 PMC: 8223279. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04454-8.

References

Miyazaki Y, Nakamura T, Kogame K, Saito M, Yamamoto K, Suguro T . Analysis of the kinematics of total knee prostheses with a medial pivot design. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 26(7):1038-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.015. View

Dickschas J, Harrer J, Bayer T, Schwitulla J, Strecker W . Correlation of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance with the Q-angle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 24(3):915-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3426-2. View

Calmbach W, Hutchens M . Evaluation of patients presenting with knee pain: Part II. Differential diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2003; 68(5):917-22. View

Kirsch M, Fitzgerald S, Friedman H, Rogers L . Transient lateral patellar dislocation: diagnosis with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 161(1):109-13. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.161.1.8517287. View

Apostolovic M, Vukomanovic B, Slavkovic N, Vuckovic V, Vukcevic M, Djuricic G . Acute patellar dislocation in adolescents: operative versus nonoperative treatment. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(10):1483-7. PMC: 3174298. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1265-z. View

Herrington L, Nester C . Q-angle undervalued? The relationship between Q-angle and medio-lateral position of the patella. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004; 19(10):1070-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.07.010. View

Biyani R, Elias J, Saranathan A, Feng H, Guseila L, Morscher M . Anatomical factors influencing patellar tracking in the unstable patellofemoral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22(10):2334-41. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3195-y. View

Schoettle P, Zanetti M, Seifert B, Pfirrmann C, Fucentese S, Romero J . The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. Knee. 2005; 13(1):26-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2005.06.003. View

Freedman B, Brindle T, Sheehan F . Re-evaluating the functional implications of the Q-angle and its relationship to in-vivo patellofemoral kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014; 29(10):1139-45. PMC: 4255138. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.09.012. View

10.

Sanfridsson J, Arnbjornsson A, Friden T, Ryd L, Svahn G, Jonsson K . Femorotibial rotation and the Q-angle related to the dislocating patella. Acta Radiol. 2001; 42(2):218-24. View

11.

Smith T, Hunt N, Donell S . The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16(12):1068-79. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0643-6. View

12.

Tensho K, Akaoka Y, Shimodaira H, Takanashi S, Ikegami S, Kato H . What Components Comprise the Measurement of the Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance in a Patellar Dislocation Population?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(17):1441-8. PMC: 7535107. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01313. View

13.

Merchant A, Mercer R . Lateral release of the patella. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974; (103):40-5. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197409000-00027. View

14.

Lee C, Wu C, Pan R, Lu H, Shen H . Medial retinacular flap advancement and arthroscopic lateral release for symptomatic chronic patellar lateral subluxation with tilting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22(10):2499-504. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3201-4. View

15.

Cooney A, Kazi Z, Caplan N, Newby M, St Clair Gibson A, Kader D . The relationship between quadriceps angle and tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in patients with patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(12):2399-404. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1907-8. View

16.

Kolowich P, Paulos L, Rosenberg T, FARNSWORTH S . Lateral release of the patella: indications and contraindications. Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18(4):359-65. DOI: 10.1177/036354659001800405. View

17.

Goldthwait J . V. Permanent Dislocation of the Patella. The Report of a Case of Twenty Years' Duration, successfully treated by Transplantation of the Patella Tendons with the Tubercle of the Tibia. Ann Surg. 1899; 29(1):62-8. PMC: 1427123. View

18.

Nietosvaara Y, Aalto K, Kallio P . Acute patellar dislocation in children: incidence and associated osteochondral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994; 14(4):513-5. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199407000-00018. View

19.

Huberti H, Hayes W . Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(5):715-24. View

20.

BRATTSTROEM H . SHAPE OF THE INTERCONDYLAR GROOVE NORMALLY AND IN RECURRENT DISLOCATION OF PATELLA. A CLINICAL AND X-RAY-ANATOMICAL INVESTIGATION. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1964; 68:SUPPL 68:1-148. View