» Articles » PMID: 22278658

The Relationship Between Quadriceps Angle and Tibial Tuberosity-trochlear Groove Distance in Patients with Patellar Instability

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2012 Jan 27
PMID 22278658
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The quadriceps angle (Q-angle) represents the angle between the vector of action of the quadriceps and the patellar tendon. An increased Q-angle has been associated with an increased risk of patellar instability, although there is disagreement on its reliability and validity as it is affected by the position of the limb and contraction of the quadriceps. Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) is ascertained by axial CT scanning, with an increased value associated with patellar instability. This study aimed to determine whether the Q-angle correlates with the TT-TG distance in patients with patellar instability.

Methods: Q-angles were measured in 34 knees that had previously undergone CT scanning for assessment of patellar instability. Measurements were made with the patient supine, the knee extended and the lower limbs in neutral rotation with the quadriceps relaxed and contracted. TT-TG distance was measured on CT scanning in an identical position.

Results: Of the 34 knees measured, 24 had symptoms of patellar instability, and 10 were normal. A significant negative correlation between relaxed Q-angle and TT-TG in all knees was demonstrated (p = 0.028). In symptomatic knees, contracted Q-angle also demonstrated a significant negative correlation with TT-TG (p = 0.037).

Conclusions: If TT-TG distance is regarded as the gold standard measurement, Q-angle is not a reliable indicator of patellar instability. There is a clear need to develop methods to more fully characterise the knee and factors contributing to patellar instability.

Level Of Evidence: II.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic value of TT-TG and TT-ME distances in the assessment of patellofemoral instability.

Yang M, Yu H Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 42(10):1199-1205.

PMID: 38819693 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01601-8.


Derotational distal femur osteotomy with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction can get good outcomes in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation with excessive TT-TG and increased femoral anteversion.

Huo Z, Hao K, Fan C, Niu Y, Bai H, Bai W Front Surg. 2024; 11:1392947.

PMID: 38660587 PMC: 11039896. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1392947.


Association of Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance With Risk of ACL Graft Failure.

Chen K, Lee E, Kliethermes S, Scerpella T Orthop J Sports Med. 2023; 11(6):23259671231180860.

PMID: 37441506 PMC: 10333637. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231180860.


Anatomical Components Associated With Increased Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance.

Xu C, Cui Z, Yan L, Chen Z, Wang F Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(8):23259671221113841.

PMID: 36003969 PMC: 9393578. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221113841.


Coronal Movement during Flexion and Extension of Knee Joints.

Zhang F, Pei F, Shao Q, Deng Y, Dai P, Yang D Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:4237558.

PMID: 35911137 PMC: 9328963. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4237558.


References
1.
Balcarek P, Jung K, Frosch K, Sturmer K . Value of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in patellar instability in the young athlete. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(8):1756-61. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511404883. View

2.
Brattstrom H . Patella alta in non-dislocating knee joints. Acta Orthop Scand. 1970; 41(5):578-88. DOI: 10.3109/17453677008991549. View

3.
France L, Nester C . Effect of errors in the identification of anatomical landmarks on the accuracy of Q angle values. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2001; 16(8):710-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00045-6. View

4.
Shakespeare D, Fick D . Patellar instability-can the TT-TG distance be measured clinically?. Knee. 2005; 12(3):201-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2003.08.007. View

5.
Huri G, Atay O, Ergen B, Atesok K, Johnson D, Doral M . Development of femoral trochlear groove in growing rabbit after patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 20(2):232-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1603-0. View