» Articles » PMID: 28376093

Can Machine-learning Improve Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Using Routine Clinical Data?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Apr 5
PMID 28376093
Citations 391
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current approaches to predict cardiovascular risk fail to identify many people who would benefit from preventive treatment, while others receive unnecessary intervention. Machine-learning offers opportunity to improve accuracy by exploiting complex interactions between risk factors. We assessed whether machine-learning can improve cardiovascular risk prediction.

Methods: Prospective cohort study using routine clinical data of 378,256 patients from UK family practices, free from cardiovascular disease at outset. Four machine-learning algorithms (random forest, logistic regression, gradient boosting machines, neural networks) were compared to an established algorithm (American College of Cardiology guidelines) to predict first cardiovascular event over 10-years. Predictive accuracy was assessed by area under the 'receiver operating curve' (AUC); and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) to predict 7.5% cardiovascular risk (threshold for initiating statins).

Findings: 24,970 incident cardiovascular events (6.6%) occurred. Compared to the established risk prediction algorithm (AUC 0.728, 95% CI 0.723-0.735), machine-learning algorithms improved prediction: random forest +1.7% (AUC 0.745, 95% CI 0.739-0.750), logistic regression +3.2% (AUC 0.760, 95% CI 0.755-0.766), gradient boosting +3.3% (AUC 0.761, 95% CI 0.755-0.766), neural networks +3.6% (AUC 0.764, 95% CI 0.759-0.769). The highest achieving (neural networks) algorithm predicted 4,998/7,404 cases (sensitivity 67.5%, PPV 18.4%) and 53,458/75,585 non-cases (specificity 70.7%, NPV 95.7%), correctly predicting 355 (+7.6%) more patients who developed cardiovascular disease compared to the established algorithm.

Conclusions: Machine-learning significantly improves accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction, increasing the number of patients identified who could benefit from preventive treatment, while avoiding unnecessary treatment of others.

Citing Articles

Pathways to chronic disease detection and prediction: Mapping the potential of machine learning to the pathophysiological processes while navigating ethical challenges.

Afrifa-Yamoah E, Adua E, Peprah-Yamoah E, Anto E, Opoku-Yamoah V, Acheampong E Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2025; 11(1):1-21.

PMID: 40051825 PMC: 11880127. DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.137.


Current Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.

Basubrin O Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77561.

PMID: 39958114 PMC: 11830112. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77561.


Machine learning based prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk using electronic health records data: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu T, Krentz A, Lu L, Curcin V Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025; 6(1):7-22.

PMID: 39846062 PMC: 11750195. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae080.


Comparison of cardiovascular risk prediction models developed using machine learning based on data from a Sri Lankan cohort with World Health Organization risk charts for predicting cardiovascular risk among Sri Lankans: a cohort study.

Mettananda C, Solangaarachchige M, Haddela P, Dassanayake A, Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe R BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e081434.

PMID: 39819943 PMC: 11751841. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081434.


Issues and Limitations on the Road to Fair and Inclusive AI Solutions for Biomedical Challenges.

Faust O, Salvi M, Barua P, Chakraborty S, Molinari F, Rajendra Acharya U Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.

PMID: 39796996 PMC: 11723364. DOI: 10.3390/s25010205.


References
1.
Voss R, Cullen P, Schulte H, Assmann G . Prediction of risk of coronary events in middle-aged men in the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study (PROCAM) using neural networks. Int J Epidemiol. 2003; 31(6):1253-62; discussion 1262-64. DOI: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1253. View

2.
Woodward M, Brindle P, Tunstall-Pedoe H . Adding social deprivation and family history to cardiovascular risk assessment: the ASSIGN score from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC). Heart. 2006; 93(2):172-6. PMC: 1861393. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.108167. View

3.
Mullerova H, Agusti A, Erqou S, Mapel D . Cardiovascular comorbidity in COPD: systematic literature review. Chest. 2013; 144(4):1163-1178. DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2847. View

4.
Osborn D, Hardoon S, Omar R, Holt R, King M, Larsen J . Cardiovascular risk prediction models for people with severe mental illness: results from the prediction and management of cardiovascular risk in people with severe mental illnesses (PRIMROSE) research program. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014; 72(2):143-51. PMC: 4353842. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2133. View

5.
Jardine A, Gaston R, Fellstrom B, Holdaas H . Prevention of cardiovascular disease in adult recipients of kidney transplants. Lancet. 2011; 378(9800):1419-27. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61334-2. View