» Articles » PMID: 28369658

Tracking the Evolution of 3D Gene Organization Demonstrates Its Connection to Phenotypic Divergence

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2017 Apr 4
PMID 28369658
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has recently been shown that the organization of genes in eukaryotic genomes, and specifically in 3D, is strongly related to gene expression and function and partially conserved between organisms. However, previous studies of 3D genomic organization analyzed each organism independently from others. Here, we propose an approach for unified inter-organismal analysis of gene organization based on a network representation of Hi-C data. We define and detect four classes of spatially co-evolving orthologous modules (SCOMs), i.e. gene families that co-evolve in their 3D organization, based on patterns of divergence and conservation of distances. We demonstrate our methodology on Hi-C data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and identify, among others, modules relating to RNA splicing machinery and chromatin silencing by small RNA which are central to S. pombe's lifestyle. Our results emphasize the importance of 3D genomic organization in eukaryotes and suggest that the evolutionary mechanisms that shape gene organization affect the organism fitness and phenotypes. The proposed algorithms can be utilized in future studies of genome evolution and comparative analysis of spatial genomic organization in different tissues, conditions and single cells.

Citing Articles

Strong association between genomic 3D structure and CRISPR cleavage efficiency.

Bergman S, Tuller T PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(6):e1012214.

PMID: 38848440 PMC: 11189236. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012214.


Benchmarking of computational error-correction methods for next-generation sequencing data.

Mitchell K, Brito J, Mandric I, Wu Q, Knyazev S, Chang S Genome Biol. 2020; 21(1):71.

PMID: 32183840 PMC: 7079412. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-01988-3.


Developing novel methods to image and visualize 3D genomes.

Ma T, Chen L, Shi M, Niu J, Zhang X, Yang X Cell Biol Toxicol. 2018; 34(5):367-380.

PMID: 29577183 PMC: 6133007. DOI: 10.1007/s10565-018-9427-z.

References
1.
Valton A, Dekker J . TAD disruption as oncogenic driver. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016; 36:34-40. PMC: 4880504. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.03.008. View

2.
Puig S, Askeland E, Thiele D . Coordinated remodeling of cellular metabolism during iron deficiency through targeted mRNA degradation. Cell. 2005; 120(1):99-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.032. View

3.
Grun C, Hochstenbach F, Humbel B, Verkleij A, Sietsma J, Klis F . The structure of cell wall alpha-glucan from fission yeast. Glycobiology. 2004; 15(3):245-57. DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwi002. View

4.
Heng Y, Koh C . Actin cytoskeleton dynamics and the cell division cycle. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010; 42(10):1622-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.04.007. View

5.
Hedges S . The origin and evolution of model organisms. Nat Rev Genet. 2002; 3(11):838-49. DOI: 10.1038/nrg929. View