» Articles » PMID: 28367304

Age As A Predictor of Embryo Quality Regardless of The Quantitative Ovarian Response

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 4
PMID 28367304
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: One determining factor of a successful fertilization (IVF) cycle is embryo quality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate associations of embryo quality and reserve markers like age, FSH and AMH.

Materials And Methods: In this prospective study, 120 infertile women, aged 21-44 years, undergoing routine exploration during an unstimulated cycle preceding assisted reproductive technology (ART) at our center were studied prospectively, from February 2011 to December 2014. Descriptive parameters and patient characteristics were reported as mean (SD) or median (range) depending on the distribution. Student's t test was performed for continuous variables, Wilcoxon and Pearson's Test were used for not distributed variables and Fisher's Test was performed for categorical variables. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Overall, at the time of investigation, patients had a mean age of 33.03 ± 4.15 years old. On cycle day three, serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level was 3.50 ± 1.54 ng/mL, serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level was 6.29 ± 1.53 mUI/ mL, at baseline, women had 16.57 ± 7.0 antral follicles. The mean of collected oocytes was 11.80 ± 5.25, embryo I+II was 2.46 ± 2.11. A greater number of embryos I+II was observed in young patients. By evaluating 120 patients, a significant relationship was observed between age and FSH (r=0.24, P=0.01), age with AMH (r=-0.22, P=0.02), age with collected oocytes (r=-0.23, P=0.03) and age with embryo I+II (r=-0.22, P=0.03). A significant relationship was also observed between antral follicle count (AFC) and AMH (r=0.29, P=0.01), AFC and the number of transferred embryo (r=-0.18, P=0.03), AFC and total dose of the drugs (r=-0.23, P=0.03). Significant relationship of FSH with total dose of drugs (r=0.19, P=0.02) was also observed. In addition, we determined significant relationships between AMH and the number of collected oocytes (r=0.38, P=0.01), AMH and the number of metaphase II oocytes (r= 0.35, P=0.01), AMH and the number of embryo (r=0.19, P=0.04) as well as AMH and total dose of the drugs (r=-0.25, P=0.01).

Conclusion: Commonly used clinical markers of ovarian reserve are reflection of the ovarian reserve, while the outcome measurements of ART and age are the best predictors of embryo quality.

Citing Articles

Nomogram to predict the probability of clinical pregnancy in women with poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Zhu S, Jiang W, Sun Y, Chen L, Li R, Chen X Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(3):1697-1707.

PMID: 38913207 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07598-9.


Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting clinical pregnancy in endometriosis patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer.

Zhu S, Liao X, Jiang W, Sun Y, Chen X, Zheng B BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):764.

PMID: 37907870 PMC: 10617063. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06082-7.


The Relationship between Number of Supernumerary Blastocysts Cryopreserved and Probability of a Live Birth Outcome after Single Fresh Blastocyst Transfer: Analysis of over 10 Thousand Cycles.

Beebeejaun Y, Copeland T, Polanski L, El Toukhy T J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37445207 PMC: 10342384. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134172.


Comparison of clinical effects between early follicular prolonged GnRH agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol in 3310 cycles: a retrospective study.

Gui J, Ni Y, Liu Q, Wang X, Xie Q BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):942.

PMID: 36522703 PMC: 9756476. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05295-6.


Prediction model of gonadotropin starting dose and its clinical application in controlled ovarian stimulation.

Hua L, Zhe Y, Jing Y, Fujin S, Jiao C, Liu L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):810.

PMID: 36333671 PMC: 9635211. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05152-6.


References
1.
Desai N, Goldstein J, Rowland D, Goldfarb J . Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(10):2190-6. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.10.2190. View

2.
Navot D, Rosenwaks Z, Margalioth E . Prognostic assessment of female fecundity. Lancet. 1987; 2(8560):645-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92439-1. View

3.
Hoover L, Baker A, Check J, Lurie D, OShaughnessy A . Evaluation of a new embryo-grading system to predict pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995; 40(3):151-7. DOI: 10.1159/000292326. View

4.
Benadiva C, Kligman I, Munne S . Aneuploidy 16 in human embryos increases significantly with maternal age. Fertil Steril. 1996; 66(2):248-55. View

5.
Fisch J, Rodriguez H, Ross R, Overby G, Sher G . The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(9):1970-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1970. View