» Articles » PMID: 28361027

Cone-beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Accessory Maxillary Ostium and Haller Cells: Prevalence and Clinical Significance

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Apr 1
PMID 28361027
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of Haller cells and accessory maxillary ostium (AMO) in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, and to analyze the relationships among Haller cells, AMO, and maxillary sinusitis.

Materials And Methods: Volumetric CBCT scans from 201 patients were retrieved from our institution's Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine archive folder. Two observers evaluated the presence of Haller cells, AMO, and maxillary sinusitis in the CBCT scans.

Results: AMO was observed in 114 patients, of whom 27 (23.7%) had AMO exclusively on the right side, 26 (22.8%) only on the left side, and 61 (53.5%) bilaterally. Haller cells were identified in 73 (36.3%) patients. In 24 (32.9%) they were present exclusively on the right side, in 17 (23.3%) they were only present on the left side, and in 32 (43.8%) they were located bilaterally. Of the 73 (36.3%) patients with Haller cells, maxillary sinusitis was also present in 50 (68.5%). On using chi-square test, a significant association was observed between AMO and maxillary sinusitis in the presence of Haller cells.

Conclusion: Our results showed AMO and Haller cells to be associated with maxillary sinusitis. This study provides evidence for the usefulness of CBCT in imaging the bony anatomy of the sinonasal complex with significantly higher precision and a smaller radiation dose.

Citing Articles

The relationship between structures affecting maxillary sinus ventilation and maxillary sinus volume: a CT study.

Guven M, Saygin D, Uysal I, Emlik G Surg Radiol Anat. 2025; 47(1):98.

PMID: 40072573 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-025-03607-x.


Accuracy of deep learning models in the detection of accessory ostium in coronal cone beam computed tomographic images.

Shetty S, Talaat W, Al-Rawi N, Al Kawas S, Sadek M, Elayyan M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8324.

PMID: 40064998 PMC: 11894202. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93250-8.


Evaluation of the Frequency of Anatomic Variations of the Paranasal Sinus Region by Using Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Ali B, Nadeem Z, Naeem M, Arif K, Zaman A, Noor A Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(3):e70535.

PMID: 40051488 PMC: 11882386. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70535.


Dental maxillary sinus pathology: a CBCT-based case-control study.

Castro J, Junqueira J, Rodrigues C, Santos G, Martinez C, Panzarella F Odontology. 2025; .

PMID: 39755845 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-01045-6.


New Perspectives in the Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis-Haller Cells.

Nedelcu A, Tepordei R, Lupu A, Lupu V, Moraru M, Partene Vicoleanu S Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39597052 PMC: 11596019. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111867.


References
1.
Jackman A, Palmer J, Chiu A, Kennedy D . Use of intraoperative CT scanning in endoscopic sinus surgery: a preliminary report. Am J Rhinol. 2008; 22(2):170-4. DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3153. View

2.
Batra P, Kanowitz S, Citardi M . Clinical utility of intraoperative volume computed tomography scanner for endoscopic sinonasal and skull base procedures. Am J Rhinol. 2008; 22(5):511-5. DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3216. View

3.
Bolger W, Butzin C, PARSONS D . Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991; 101(1 Pt 1):56-64. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199101000-00010. View

4.
LLOYD G . CT of the paranasal sinuses: study of a control series in relation to endoscopic sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1990; 104(6):477-81. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100112927. View

5.
Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A, Fellows D, Lurie A . Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42(9):20130055. PMC: 3828019. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130055. View