» Articles » PMID: 27300297

The Effect of the Presence of the Accessory Maxillary Ostium on the Maxillary Sinus

Overview
Date 2016 Jun 15
PMID 27300297
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the presence of the accessory maxillary ostium and its effects on the maxillary sinus, and the concurrent occurrence of morphological variations of neighboring anatomical structures. This study was performed in a tertiary referral center. This is a cross-sectional retrospective study that evaluated coronal CTs of patients to determine the frequency of the accessory maxillary ostium and investigated any simultaneous morphological variations in neighboring anatomical structures. The presence of the accessory maxillary ostium (AMO) plus any concurrent morphological variations of neighboring structures were investigated in 377 patients, with 754 sides. AMO was found to be present in 19.1 % (72/377) of the patients. A concurrent mucus retention cyst was found to be statistically significant on both sides (right side: p = 0.00, left side: p = 0.00), as well as mucosal thickening (right side: p = 0.00, left side: p = 0.00), and maxillary sinusitis (right side: p = 0.04, left side: p = 0.03). No other concurrent variations of statistical significance were detected in the neighboring structures. Our study demonstrated that with the presence of AMO, the likelihood of encountering a mucus retention cyst (48.6 %) had an approximately threefold increase, and that of encountering mucosal thickening (43.0 %) and maxillary sinusitis (29.1 %) had a twofold increase.

Citing Articles

Anatomical Variations in Nasal Cavities and Paranasal Sinuses on Computed Tomography in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment.

Phan T, Hoang N, Le T, Nguyen T Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025; 77(1):120-126.

PMID: 40066395 PMC: 11890662. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-05123-7.


Accuracy of deep learning models in the detection of accessory ostium in coronal cone beam computed tomographic images.

Shetty S, Talaat W, Al-Rawi N, Al Kawas S, Sadek M, Elayyan M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8324.

PMID: 40064998 PMC: 11894202. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93250-8.


Radiodiagnostic properties of maxillary antroliths: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.

Gunacar D, Kose T, Ceren F BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):259.

PMID: 39972501 PMC: 11837370. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05641-y.


Dental maxillary sinus pathology: a CBCT-based case-control study.

Castro J, Junqueira J, Rodrigues C, Santos G, Martinez C, Panzarella F Odontology. 2025; .

PMID: 39755845 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-01045-6.


Relationships Between Radiomorphometric Parameters of the Maxillary Sinus and Development of Sinusitis: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Anbiaee N, Shooshtari Z, Ghavam H, Shahri A Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(5):4373-4380.

PMID: 39376393 PMC: 11455745. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-04865-8.


References
1.
Stallman J, Lobo J, Som P . The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25(9):1613-8. PMC: 7976404. View

2.
Busaba N, Kieff D . Endoscopic sinus surgery for inflammatory maxillary sinus disease. Laryngoscope. 2002; 112(8 Pt 1):1378-83. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200208000-00010. View

3.
Behrbohm H, Sydow K . [Nuclear medicine studies of the regenerative behavior of paranasal sinus mucosa after functional endoscopic ethmoid bone surgery]. HNO. 1991; 39(5):173-6. View

4.
Hadar T, Shvero J, Nageris B, Yaniv E . Mucus retention cyst of the maxillary sinus: the endoscopic approach. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 38(3):227-9. DOI: 10.1054/bjom.1999.0160. View

5.
Hong S, Cho K, Roh H . Maxillary sinus retention cysts protruding into the inferior meatus. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 7(3):226-8. PMC: 4135161. DOI: 10.3342/ceo.2014.7.3.226. View