Fully Automated VMAT Treatment Planning for Advanced-stage NSCLC Patients

Overview

Journal Strahlenther Onkol

Specialties Oncology
Radiology

Date 2017 Mar 19

PMID 28314877

Citations 21

Authors

Giuseppe Della Gala

Maarten L P Dirkx

Nienke Hoekstra

Dennie Fransen

Nico Lanconelli

Marjan van de Pol

Ben J M Heijmen

Steven F Petit

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a fully automated procedure for multicriterial volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning (autoVMAT) for stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with curative intent.

Materials And Methods: After configuring the developed autoVMAT system for NSCLC, autoVMAT plans were compared with manually generated clinically delivered intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for 41 patients. AutoVMAT plans were also compared to manually generated VMAT plans in the absence of time pressure. For 16 patients with reduced planning target volume (PTV) dose prescription in the clinical IMRT plan (to avoid violation of organs at risk tolerances), the potential for dose escalation with autoVMAT was explored.

Results: Two physicians evaluated 35/41 autoVMAT plans (85%) as clinically acceptable. Compared to the manually generated IMRT plans, autoVMAT plans showed statistically significant improved PTV coverage (V increased by 1.1% ± 1.1%), higher dose conformity (R reduced by 12.2% ± 12.7%), and reduced mean lung, heart, and esophagus doses (reductions of 0.9 Gy ± 1.0 Gy, 1.5 Gy ± 1.8 Gy, 3.6 Gy ± 2.8 Gy, respectively, all p < 0.001). To render the six remaining autoVMAT plans clinically acceptable, a dosimetrist needed less than 10 min hands-on time for fine-tuning. AutoVMAT plans were also considered equivalent or better than manually optimized VMAT plans. For 6/16 patients, autoVMAT allowed tumor dose escalation of 5-10 Gy.

Conclusion: Clinically deliverable, high-quality autoVMAT plans can be generated fully automatically for the vast majority of advanced-stage NSCLC patients. For a subset of patients, autoVMAT allowed for tumor dose escalation.

Citing Articles

Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for radiation therapy of locally advanced breast cancer.

Marrazzo L, Redapi L, Pellegrini R, Voet P, Meattini I, Arilli C Radiat Oncol. 2023; 18(1):176.

PMID: 37904150 PMC: 10617151. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02364-8.

Machine learning in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy: A bibliometric analysis.

Zhang J, Zhu H, Wang J, Chen Y, Li Y, Chen X Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1082423.

PMID: 37025583 PMC: 10072228. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1082423.

Patient selection, inter-fraction plan robustness and reduction of toxicity risk with deep inspiration breath hold in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Fjellanger K, Rossi L, Heijmen B, Pettersen H, Sandvik I, Breedveld S Front Oncol. 2022; 12:966134.

PMID: 36110942 PMC: 9469652. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.966134.

Automated Planning for Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on the 1.5 T MR-Linac.

Naccarato S, Rigo M, Pellegrini R, Voet P, Akhiat H, Gurrera D Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 7(3):100865.

PMID: 35198836 PMC: 8850203. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100865.

Enhancing Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with iCE, a Novel System for Automated Multi-Criterial Treatment Planning Including Beam Angle Optimization.

Fjellanger K, Hysing L, Heijmen B, Pettersen H, Sandvik I, Sulen T Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(22).

PMID: 34830838 PMC: 8616198. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225683.

References

Sharpe M, Moore K, Orton C . Point/Counterpoint: Within the next ten years treatment planning will become fully automated without the need for human intervention. Med Phys. 2014; 41(12):120601. DOI: 10.1118/1.4894496. View

Sharfo A, Voet P, Breedveld S, Mens J, Hoogeman M, Heijmen B . Comparison of VMAT and IMRT strategies for cervical cancer patients using automated planning. Radiother Oncol. 2015; 114(3):395-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.006. View

Voet P, Dirkx M, Breedveld S, Al-Mamgani A, Incrocci L, Heijmen B . Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 88(5):1175-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.046. View

Bezjak A, Rumble R, Rodrigues G, Hope A, Warde P . Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012; 24(7):508-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.05.007. View

Zhang X, Li X, Quan E, Pan X, Li Y . A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2011; 56(13):3873-93. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/13/009. View

Breedveld S, Storchi P, Voet P, Heijmen B . iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. Med Phys. 2012; 39(2):951-63. DOI: 10.1118/1.3676689. View

Voet P, Dirkx M, Breedveld S, Fransen D, Levendag P, Heijmen B . Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 85(3):866-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.015. View

Wu B, McNutt T, Zahurak M, Simari P, Pang D, Taylor R . Fully automated simultaneous integrated boosted-intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning is feasible for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84(5):e647-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.047. View

Fogliata A, Belosi F, Clivio A, Navarria P, Nicolini G, Scorsetti M . On the pre-clinical validation of a commercial model-based optimisation engine: application to volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with lung or prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2014; 113(3):385-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.009. View

10.

Amit G, Purdie T . Automated planning of breast radiotherapy using cone beam CT imaging. Med Phys. 2015; 42(2):770-9. DOI: 10.1118/1.4905111. View

11.

Tol J, Dahele M, Delaney A, Doornaert P, Slotman B, Verbakel W . Detailed evaluation of an automated approach to interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. Med Phys. 2016; 43(4):1818. DOI: 10.1118/1.4944063. View

12.

Krayenbuehl J, Norton I, Studer G, Guckenberger M . Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck. Radiat Oncol. 2015; 10:226. PMC: 4641383. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0533-2. View

13.

Kamran S, Mueller B, Paetzold P, Dunlap J, Niemierko A, Bortfeld T . Multi-criteria optimization achieves superior normal tissue sparing in a planning study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for RTOG 1308-eligible non-small cell lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2016; 118(3):515-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.028. View

14.

Fiege J, McCurdy B, Potrebko P, Champion H, Cull A . PARETO: A novel evolutionary optimization approach to multiobjective IMRT planning. Med Phys. 2011; 38(9):5217-29. DOI: 10.1118/1.3615622. View

15.

Boylan C, Rowbottom C . A bias-free, automated planning tool for technique comparison in radiotherapy - application to nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15(1):4530. PMC: 5711248. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4530. View

16.

Quan E, Chang J, Liao Z, Xia T, Yuan Z, Liu H . Automated volumetric modulated Arc therapy treatment planning for stage III lung cancer: how does it compare with intensity-modulated radio therapy?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84(1):e69-76. PMC: 3428745. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.017. View

17.

Hazell I, Bzdusek K, Kumar P, Hansen C, Bertelsen A, Eriksen J . Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016; 17(1):272-282. PMC: 5690191. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5901. View