A Bias-free, Automated Planning Tool for Technique Comparison in Radiotherapy - Application to Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treatments

Overview

Journal J Appl Clin Med Phys

Specialties Biophysics
General Medicine

Date 2014 Jan 16

PMID 24423853

Citations 7

Authors

Christopher Boylan

Carl Rowbottom

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In this study a novel, user-independent automated planning technique was developed to objectively compare volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma planning, and to determine which technique offers a greater benefit for parotid-sparing and dose escalation strategies. Ten patients were investigated, with a standard prescription of three dose levels to the target volumes (70, 63, and 56 Gy), using a simultaneous integrated boost in 33 fractions. The automated tool was used to investigate three planning strategies with both IMRT and VMAT: clinically acceptable plan creation, parotid dose sparing, and dose escalation. Clinically acceptable plans were achieved for all patients using both techniques. For parotid sparing, automated planning reduced the mean dose to a greater extent using VMAT rather than IMRT (17.0 Gy and 19.6 Gy, respectively, p < 0.01). For dose escalation to the mean of the main clinical target volume, neither VMAT nor IMRT offered a significant benefit over the other. The OAR-limiting prescriptions for VMAT ranged from 84-98 Gy, compared to 76-110 Gy for IMRT. Employing a user-independent planning technique, it was possible to objectively compare VMAT and IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment strategies. VMAT offers a parotid-sparing improvement, but no significant benefit was observed for dose escalation to the primary target.

Citing Articles

Fluence smoothing evaluation for whole-breast automatically generated treatment plans.

Zaratim G, Oliveira E Silva L, Dos Reis R, Mendes C, Gomes M J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 26(2):e14564.

PMID: 39611818 PMC: 11799910. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14564.

Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey.

Momin S, Fu Y, Lei Y, Roper J, Bradley J, Curran W J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(8):16-44.

PMID: 34231970 PMC: 8364264. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13337.

Personalized setting of plan parameters using feasibility dose volume histogram for auto-planning in Pinnacle system.

Xia W, Han F, Chen J, Miao J, Dai J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020; 21(7):119-127.

PMID: 32363757 PMC: 7386185. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12897.

Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Present and Future.

Wang C, Zhu X, Hong J, Zheng D Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 18:1533033819873922.

PMID: 31495281 PMC: 6732844. DOI: 10.1177/1533033819873922.

Individualized automated planning for dose bath reduction in robotic radiosurgery for benign tumors.

Rossi L, Mendez Romero A, Milder M, de Klerck E, Breedveld S, Heijmen B PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0210279.

PMID: 30726214 PMC: 6364873. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210279.

References

Lauve A, Morris M, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Wu Q, Mohan R, Abayomi O . Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas: II--clinical results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 60(2):374-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.010. View

Bzdusek K, Friberger H, Eriksson K, Hardemark B, Robinson D, Kaus M . Development and evaluation of an efficient approach to volumetric arc therapy planning. Med Phys. 2009; 36(6):2328-39. DOI: 10.1118/1.3132234. View

Lee T, Chao P, Ting H, Lo S, Wang Y, Tuan C . Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011; 12(4):3587. PMC: 5718754. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3587. View

Yu C, Tang G . Intensity-modulated arc therapy: principles, technologies and clinical implementation. Phys Med Biol. 2011; 56(5):R31-54. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/5/R01. View

Kam M, Leung S, Zee B, Chau R, Suen J, Mo F . Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(31):4873-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.5501. View

Johnston M, Clifford S, Bromley R, Back M, Oliver L, Eade T . Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using simultaneous integrated boost for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011; 23(8):503-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.02.002. View

Deasy J, Moiseenko V, Marks L, Chao K, Nam J, Eisbruch A . Radiotherapy dose-volume effects on salivary gland function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76(3 Suppl):S58-63. PMC: 4041494. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.090. View

Nguyen N, Smith-Raymond L, Vinh-Hung V, Sloan D, Davis R, Vos P . Feasibility of Tomotherapy to spare the cochlea from excessive radiation in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2011; 47(5):414-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.03.011. View

Jones S, Williams M . Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT. Med Dosim. 2008; 33(1):86-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.04.002. View

10.

Belec J, Ploquin N, La Russa D, Clark B . Position-probability-sampled Monte Carlo calculation of VMAT, 3DCRT, step-shoot IMRT, and helical tomotherapy dose distributions using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc. Med Phys. 2011; 38(2):948-60. DOI: 10.1118/1.3538922. View

11.

Taheri-Kadkhoda Z, Pettersson N, Bjork-Eriksson T, Johansson K . Superiority of intensity-modulated radiotherapy over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a planning study. Br J Radiol. 2008; 81(965):397-405. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/36110151. View

12.

Vanetti E, Clivio A, Nicolini G, Fogliata A, Ghosh-Laskar S, Agarwal J . Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 92(1):111-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.008. View

13.

Rowbottom C, Webb S, Oldham M . Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network. Phys Med Biol. 1999; 44(9):2251-62. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/9/312. View

14.

Otto K . Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008; 35(1):310-7. DOI: 10.1118/1.2818738. View

15.

Cheng J, Chao K, Low D . Comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment techniques for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2001; 96(2):126-31. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1004. View

16.

Peponi E, Glanzmann C, Kunz G, Renner C, Tomuschat K, Studer G . Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB‑IMRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010; 186(3):135-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-010-2048-y. View

17.

Zhang P, Happersett L, Hunt M, Jackson A, Zelefsky M, Mageras G . Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 76(5):1456-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.033. View

18.

Moran J, Dempsey M, Eisbruch A, Fraass B, Galvin J, Ibbott G . Safety considerations for IMRT: executive summary. Med Phys. 2011; 38(9):5067-72. DOI: 10.1118/1.3600524. View

19.

Breedveld S, Storchi P, Voet P, Heijmen B . iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. Med Phys. 2012; 39(2):951-63. DOI: 10.1118/1.3676689. View

20.

Yan H, Yin F, Willett C . Evaluation of an artificial intelligence guided inverse planning system: clinical case study. Radiother Oncol. 2007; 83(1):76-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.013. View