» Articles » PMID: 28311495

An Experimental Manipulation of the Intensity of Interspecific Competition: Effects on a Small Marsupial

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2017 Mar 18
PMID 28311495
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An investigation was made of the effects of reducing and enhancing the intensity of competition on a small marsupial, Antechinus stuartii, from a larger and competitively dominant congener, A. swainsonii. Populations of these species were monitored in two study areas (one control, one experimental) in forest near Canberra, Australia, between February and July in 1980 and 1981. In the experimental study area in 1980 I reduced the numbers of A. swainsonii relative to A. stuartii (thus reducing the intensity of interspecific competition), but in 1981 I augmented the numbers of A. swainsonii (thus increasing the intensity of competition). No manipulations were made in the control study area, and the numbers of both species remained similar there in both years. When the intensity of interspecific competition was reduced, the A. stuartii population increased in size. Increases occurred also in individual movements, home range areas, diurnal activity and in the proportion of large terrestrial prey (larvae, Amphipoda) in the diet. An increase in use of structurally complex forest floor habitats also coincided with decreased arboreal activity. In contrast, when the intensity of competition was enhanced, most of these population and resource shifts were reversed. These findings suggest that reduction in the intensity of interspecific competition allows A. stuartii access to terrestrial sources of food favoured by A. swainsonii, whereas enhancement leads to exclusion of A. stuartii from the forest floor. Competition occurs by interference. This may result in fixed per capita competitive effects of A. swainsonii on A. stuartii, and account for the observed changes in a very broad range of population and resource parameters.

Citing Articles

Contrasting population manipulations reveal resource competition between two large marsupials: bare-nosed wombats and eastern grey kangaroos.

Tamura J, Ingram J, Martin A, Burridge C, Carver S Oecologia. 2021; 197(2):313-325.

PMID: 34095983 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04959-y.


Determining the efficacy of camera traps, live capture traps, and detection dogs for locating cryptic small mammal species.

Thomas M, Baker L, Beattie J, Baker A Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(2):1054-1068.

PMID: 32015864 PMC: 6988557. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5972.


Mechanisms of competition among insectivorous mammals.

Dickman C Oecologia. 2017; 85(4):464-471.

PMID: 28312492 DOI: 10.1007/BF00323757.


Camera trapping: a contemporary approach to monitoring invasive rodents in high conservation priority ecosystems.

Rendall A, Sutherland D, Cooke R, White J PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e86592.

PMID: 24599307 PMC: 3943715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086592.


Demography and competition in Hyrax : A 17 years study.

Hoeck H Oecologia. 2013; 79(3):353-60.

PMID: 23921400 DOI: 10.1007/BF00384314.


References
1.
Pacala S, Roughgarden J . Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in two two-species insular anolis lizard communities. Science. 1982; 217(4558):444-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.217.4558.444. View

2.
Dickman C, Woodside D . A test of a competition model with reference to three species of small mammals in south-eastern Australia. Oecologia. 2017; 60(1):127-134. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379332. View

3.
Belovsky G . Moose and snowshoe hare competition and a mechanistic explanation from foraging theory. Oecologia. 2017; 61(2):150-159. DOI: 10.1007/BF00396753. View

4.
Munger J, Brown J . Competition in desert rodents: an experiment with semipermeable exclosures. Science. 1981; 211(4481):510-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.211.4481.510. View

5.
Jennrich R, TURNER F . Measurement of non-circular home range. J Theor Biol. 1969; 22(2):227-37. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90002-2. View