» Articles » PMID: 28309404

Moose and Snowshoe Hare Competition and a Mechanistic Explanation from Foraging Theory

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2017 Mar 18
PMID 28309404
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Moose (Alces alces) and snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) appear to compete with each other. This was determined using the "natural experiments" of populations found in sympatry and allopatry on islands at Isle Royale National Park, Michigan, and manipulated exclosures. The population densities from these areas are fit to a series of competition models based upon different competitive mechanisms (Schoener 1974a), using non-linear regression techniques. A model of competition for food where the food can be separated into exclusively used and shared categories is found to predict observed densities of moose and hare best. Finally, the competition model's parameters (fraction of food shared and competition coefficients) are shown to agree with values predicted independently from a foraging model.

Citing Articles

Ecological modelling approaches for predicting emergent properties in microbial communities.

van den Berg N, Machado D, Santos S, Rocha I, Chacon J, Harcombe W Nat Ecol Evol. 2022; 6(7):855-865.

PMID: 35577982 PMC: 7613029. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01746-7.


Exploitative Competition between Mountain Hare and Moose-Qualitative Effects on Hare Winter Forage?.

Pedersen S, Pedersen H Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(9).

PMID: 34573604 PMC: 8469073. DOI: 10.3390/ani11092638.


Spatiotemporal Overlap between the European Brown Hare and Its Potential Predators and Competitors.

Viviano A, Mori E, Fattorini N, Mazza G, Lazzeri L, Panichi A Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(2).

PMID: 33669965 PMC: 7924828. DOI: 10.3390/ani11020562.


Impact of rewilding, species introductions and climate change on the structure and function of the Yukon boreal forest ecosystem.

Boonstra R, Boutin S, Jung T, Krebs C, Taylor S Integr Zool. 2017; 13(2):123-138.

PMID: 29168615 PMC: 5888177. DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12288.


Resource partitioning by mammalian herbivores in the high Arctic.

Klein D, Bay C Oecologia. 2017; 97(4):439-450.

PMID: 28313731 DOI: 10.1007/BF00325880.


References
1.
Gilpin M, Ayala F . Global models of growth and competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973; 70(12):3590-3. PMC: 427286. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3590. View

2.
Schoener T . Alternatives to Lotka-Volterra competition: models of intermediate complexity. Theor Popul Biol. 1976; 10(3):309-33. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90022-8. View

3.
Abrams P . Alternative methods of measuring competition applied to two Australian hermit crabs. Oecologia. 2017; 51(2):233-239. DOI: 10.1007/BF00540607. View

4.
Pianka E . Niche overlap and diffuse competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974; 71(5):2141-5. PMC: 388403. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.2141. View

5.
Belovsky G . Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theor Popul Biol. 1978; 14(1):105-34. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90007-2. View