Range-body Mass Interactions of a Northern Ungulate - a Test of Hypothesis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Summer diet, summer temperature, length of the growth season and animal density appeared to best explain annual and regional differences in calf and yearling body mass in moose from southeastern Norway. In general animals inhabiting steep, alpine landscapes had less body mass than animals using flat, low-altitude habitats. Autumn body mass of calves and yearlings decreased with increasing snow depth during the preceding winter and spring. However, calf body mass was more influenced by the summer range and less by the winter range than was body mass of yearlings. There was no indication that the effect of snow depth on autumn body mass was greater in moose living on poor than on good summer ranges. Body mass decreased with increasing competition for summer forage, while the winter range mainly had an density-independent effect. Habitat quality, expressed as regression lines between calf and yearling body mass and animal density (hunting yield), differed between regions. On ranges of medium and high altitude where birch (Betula spp.) rowan (Sorbus aucuparia) and bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) dominated moose summer diet, body mass decreased at a rapid rate with increasing animal density. Body mass decreased at a slower rate at low-altitude ranges and at high-altitude ranges where willow (Salix spp.) and forbs dominated the diet. Body mass of lactating cows decreased with increasing animal density, but animal density did not affect body mass of non-lactating cows. There was no indication that the decrease in autumn body mass with increasing moose density over the last 25 years has caused a decrease in animal condition (ability to survive the winter). The results are discussed in relation to the effect of summer and winter range on population regulation in moose. It is concluded that a density-dependent effect is apparent on the summer range even at low and intermediate population densities. On the winter range, on the other hand, density-dependence is likely to occur only at high levels of population density.
Biomarkers of Animal Nutrition: From Seasonal to Lifetime Indicators of Environmental Conditions.
Smiley R, LaSharr T, Abernathy H, Shakeri Y, Levine R, Rankins S Life (Basel). 2022; 12(3).
PMID: 35330126 PMC: 8949293. DOI: 10.3390/life12030375.
Macronutrient balancing in free-ranging populations of moose.
Felton A, Wam H, Felton A, Simpson S, Stolter C, Hedwall P Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(16):11223-11240.
PMID: 34429914 PMC: 8366896. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7909.
Felton A, Holmstrom E, Malmsten J, Felton A, Cromsigt J, Edenius L Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):1904.
PMID: 32024896 PMC: 7002458. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58673-5.
MacDonald C, Jones G, Bridge T Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1890).
PMID: 30404872 PMC: 6235031. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1545.
Moose selecting for specific nutritional composition of birch places limits on food acceptability.
Wam H, Felton A, Stolter C, Nybakken L, Hjeljord O Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(2):1117-1130.
PMID: 29375784 PMC: 5773297. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3715.