Geographical Variation in the Influence of Density Dependence and Climate on the Recruitment of Norwegian Moose

Overview

Journal Oecologia

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2009 Aug 7

PMID 19657678

Citations 13

Authors

Vidar Grotan

Bernt-Erik Saether

Magnar Lillegard

Erling J Solberg

Steinar Engen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The effects of variation in climate on population dynamics are likely to differ within the distributional range of a species, yet the consequences of such regional variation on demography and population dynamics are rarely considered. Here we examine how density dependence and different climate variables affect spatio-temporal variation in recruitment rates of Norwegian moose using data collected over a large geographical area during the hunting season. After accounting for observation error by a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo technique, temporal variation in recruitment rates was relatively independent of fluctuations in local population size. In fact, a positive relationship was as common as a density-dependent decrease in fecundity rates. In general, high recruitment rates were found during autumn 1 year after years with a warm February, and after a warm May or cold June in year t - 1 or in year t. Large regional variation was also found in the effects of some of the weather variables, especially during spring. These patterns demonstrate both direct and delayed effects of weather on the recruitment of moose that possibly operate through an effect of body mass on the proportion of the females that sexually mature as 1.5 or 2.5 years old.

Citing Articles

Quantifying large carnivore predation relative to human harvest on moose in an intensively managed boreal ecosystem.

Sand H, Zimmermann B, Wabakken P, Eriksen A, Wikenros C Ecol Appl. 2025; 35(1):e70000.

PMID: 39930970 PMC: 11811747. DOI: 10.1002/eap.70000.

Wounded but unstressed: Moose tolerate injurious flies in the boreal forest.

Benedict B, Thompson D, Crouse J, Hamer G, Barboza P J Mammal. 2024; 105(5):1166-1174.

PMID: 39474311 PMC: 11520747. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyae081.

Spatial patterns in the contribution of biotic and abiotic factors to the population dynamics of three freshwater fish species.

Chevalier M, Tedesco P, Grenouillet G PeerJ. 2022; 10:e12857.

PMID: 35228906 PMC: 8881916. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12857.

Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia.

Wikenros C, Sand H, Mansson J, Maartmann E, Eriksen A, Wabakken P Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):21670.

PMID: 33303844 PMC: 7730186. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8.

High-Arctic family planning: earlier spring onset advances age at first reproduction in barnacle geese.

Fjelldal M, Layton-Matthews K, Lee A, Grotan V, Loonen M, Hansen B Biol Lett. 2020; 16(4):20200075.

PMID: 32264780 PMC: 7211454. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0075.

References

Lande R, Engen S, Saether B, Coulson T . Estimating density dependence from time series of population age structure. Am Nat. 2006; 168(1):76-87. DOI: 10.1086/504851. View

Saether B, Lillegard M, Grotan V, Filli F, Engen S . Predicting fluctuations of reintroduced ibex populations: the importance of density dependence, environmental stochasticity and uncertain population estimates. J Anim Ecol. 2007; 76(2):326-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01197.x. View

Skogland T . The effects of density dependent resource limitation on size of wild reindeer. Oecologia. 2017; 60(2):156-168. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379517. View

Herfindal I, Saether B, Solberg E, Andersen R, Hogda K . Population characteristics predict responses in moose body mass to temporal variation in the environment. J Anim Ecol. 2006; 75(5):1110-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01138.x. View

Saether B, Lillegard M, Grotan V, Drever M, Engen S, Nudds T . Geographical gradients in the population dynamics of North American prairie ducks. J Anim Ecol. 2008; 77(5):869-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01424.x. View

Sand H . Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia. 2017; 106(2):212-220. DOI: 10.1007/BF00328601. View

Herfindal I, Solberg E, Saether B, Hogda K, Andersen R . Environmental phenology and geographical gradients in moose body mass. Oecologia. 2006; 150(2):213-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0519-8. View

Saether B, Grotan V, Tryjanowski P, Barbraud C, Engen S, Fulin M . Climate and spatio-temporal variation in the population dynamics of a long distance migrant, the white stork. J Anim Ecol. 2006; 75(1):80-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01023.x. View

Garel M, Solberg E, Saether B, Grotan V, Tufto J, Heim M . Age, size, and spatiotemporal variation in ovulation patterns of a seasonal breeder, the Norwegian moose (Alces alces). Am Nat. 2008; 173(1):89-104. DOI: 10.1086/593359. View

10.

Saether B, Engen S, Moller A, Matthysen E, Adriaensen F, Fiedler W . Climate variation and regional gradients in population dynamics of two hole-nesting passerines. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1531):2397-404. PMC: 1691515. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2499. View

11.

Engen S, Lande R, Saether B, Festa-Bianchet M . Using reproductive value to estimate key parameters in density-independent age-structured populations. J Theor Biol. 2006; 244(2):308-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.08.009. View

12.

Grosbois V, Gimenez O, Gaillard J, Pradel R, Barbraud C, Clobert J . Assessing the impact of climate variation on survival in vertebrate populations. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008; 83(3):357-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00047.x. View

13.

Stenseth , Chan , Tong , Boonstra , BOUTIN , KREBS . Common dynamic structure of canada lynx populations within three climatic regions . Science. 1999; 285(5430):1071-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5430.1071. View

14.

Hjeljord O, Histol T . Range-body mass interactions of a northern ungulate - a test of hypothesis. Oecologia. 2017; 119(3):326-339. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050793. View

15.

Saether B . Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 12(4):143-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(96)10068-9. View

16.

Hallett T, Coulson T, Pilkington J, Clutton-Brock T, Pemberton J, Grenfell B . Why large-scale climate indices seem to predict ecological processes better than local weather. Nature. 2004; 430(6995):71-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature02708. View

17.

Saether B, Engen S, Grotan V, Fiedler W, Matthysen E, Visser M . The extended Moran effect and large-scale synchronous fluctuations in the size of great tit and blue tit populations. J Anim Ecol. 2007; 76(2):315-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01195.x. View

18.

Langvatn R, Mysterud A, Stenseth N, Yoccoz N . Timing and synchrony of ovulation in red deer constrained by short northern summers. Am Nat. 2004; 163(5):763-72. DOI: 10.1086/383594. View

19.

Mysterud A, Stenseth N, Yoccoz N, Langvatn R, Steinheim G . Nonlinear effects of large-scale climatic variability on wild and domestic herbivores. Nature. 2001; 410(6832):1096-9. DOI: 10.1038/35074099. View

20.

Sand H, Cederlund G, Danell K . Geographical and latitudinal variation in growth patterns and adult body size of Swedish moose (Alces alces). Oecologia. 2017; 102(4):433-442. DOI: 10.1007/BF00341355. View