» Articles » PMID: 28290704

Predicting Manual Therapy Treatment Success in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: Improving Self-Reported Function

Overview
Journal J Athl Train
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Mar 15
PMID 28290704
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context:   Therapeutic modalities that stimulate sensory receptors around the foot-ankle complex improve chronic ankle instability (CAI)-associated impairments. However, not all patients have equal responses to these modalities. Identifying predictors of treatment success could improve clinician efficiency when treating patients with CAI.

Objective:   To conduct a response analysis on existing data to identify predictors of improved self-reported function in patients with CAI.

Design:   Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Setting:   Sports medicine research laboratories.

Patients Or Other Participants:   Fifty-nine patients with CAI, which was defined in accordance with the International Ankle Consortium recommendations.

Intervention(s):   Participants were randomized into 3 treatment groups (plantar massage [PM], ankle-joint mobilization [AJM], or calf stretching [CS]) that received six 5-minute treatments over 2 weeks.

Main Outcome Measure(s):   Treatment success, defined as a patient exceeding the minimally clinically important difference of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sport (FAAM-S).

Results:   Patients with ≤5 recurrent sprains and ≤82.73% on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure had a 98% probability of having a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after AJM. As well, ≥5 balance errors demonstrated 98% probability of meaningful FAAM-S improvements from AJM. Patients <22 years old and with ≤9.9 cm of dorsiflexion had a 99% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after PM. Also, those who made ≥2 single-limb-stance errors had a 98% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement from PM. Patients with ≤53.1% on the FAAM-S had an 83% probability of a meaningful FAAM-S improvement after CS.

Conclusions:   Each sensory-targeted ankle-rehabilitation strategy resulted in a unique combination of predictors of success for patients with CAI. Specific indicators of success with AJM were deficits in self-reported function, single-limb balance, and <5 previous sprains. Age, weight-bearing-dorsiflexion restrictions, and single-limb balance deficits identified patients with CAI who will respond well to PM. Assessing self-reported sport-related function can identify CAI patients who will respond positively to CS.

Citing Articles

Talus Position Correlates With Dorsiflexion Range of Motion Following a Lateral Ankle Sprain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Toyooka T, Tsushima E, Sugiura S, Matsushita Y, Takata A, Omori Y Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(3):e70550.

PMID: 40066243 PMC: 11892015. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70550.


Plantar massage or ankle mobilization do not alter gait biomechanics in those with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial.

Alamri R, Migel K, Cain M, Song K, Pietrosimone B, Troy Blackburn J J Man Manip Ther. 2024; 32(6):594-601.

PMID: 39392285 PMC: 11578414. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2410048.


Predicting the success of multimodal rehabilitation in chronic ankle instability based on patient-reported outcomes.

Zhang R, Qi Q, Song W, Chen Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):706.

PMID: 35879757 PMC: 9310506. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05676-0.


A 4-Week Multimodal Intervention for Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: Examination of Disease-Oriented and Patient-Oriented Outcomes.

Powden C, Hoch J, Jamali B, Hoch M J Athl Train. 2018; 54(4):384-396.

PMID: 30589387 PMC: 6522089. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-344-17.

References
1.
Ross S, Guskiewicz K . Effect of coordination training with and without stochastic resonance stimulation on dynamic postural stability of subjects with functional ankle instability and subjects with stable ankles. Clin J Sport Med. 2006; 16(4):323-8. DOI: 10.1097/00042752-200607000-00007. View

2.
Houston M, Hoch J, Hoch M . Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review. J Athl Train. 2015; 50(10):1019-33. PMC: 4641540. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.9.01. View

3.
Bennell K, Talbot R, Wajswelner H, Techovanich W, Kelly D, Hall A . Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Aust J Physiother. 2001; 44(3):175-180. DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60377-9. View

4.
Gribble P, Delahunt E, Bleakley C, Caulfield B, Docherty C, Fourchet F . Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013; 43(8):585-91. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.0303. View

5.
Martin R, Irrgang J, Burdett R, Conti S, Van Swearingen J . Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26(11):968-83. DOI: 10.1177/107110070502601113. View