» Articles » PMID: 28289482

Efficacy of Computed Tomography (CT) Attenuation Values and CT Findings in the Differentiation of Pleural Effusion

Overview
Journal Pol J Radiol
Publisher Termedia
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Mar 15
PMID 28289482
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of computed tomography (CT) findings for characterizing pleural effusions with the use of attenuation values.

Material/methods: One hundred and twenty eight patients with pleural effusions on thoracic CT who underwent thoracentesisis within two weeks were studied. Pleural effusions were classified as exudates or transudates according to the Light's criteria. A region of interest was placed for the measurement of Hounsfield Unit (HU) values in the area of the greatest amount of effusion on each slice of the three slices used. CT features that were evaluated for distinguishing pleural exudates from transudates included pleural nodules, pleural thickening and loculation.

Results: Thirty three (26%) of the 128 pleural effusions were transudates and 95 (74%) were exudates. The mean HU values of the exudates (8.82±7.04) were significantly higher than those of the transudates (2.91±8.53), (p<0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between transudate and exudate patients in terms of pleural thickness, pleural nodules and loculation (p>0.05).

Conclusions: HU values can help in differentiating exudative pleural effusions from transudative pleural effusions. Because of overlapping HU values, correlation with clinical findings is essential.

Citing Articles

Use of the Hounsfield unit scale in differentiating transudate and exudate in pleural effusion in the emergency department.

Isik N, Ozkan E, Ucgun A, Turan O, Donmez S, Yavuz Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(10):e41822.

PMID: 40068056 PMC: 11902926. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041822.


Computed tomography attenuation in differential diagnosis of transudative and exudative pleural effusions.

Gumus A, Ozcelik N, Yilmaz Kara B, Hursoy N, Zirih N, Ozyurt S Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024; 79:100463.

PMID: 39111190 PMC: 11347058. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100463.


Diagnostic accuracy of thoracic CT to differentiate transudative from exudative pleural effusion prior to thoracentesis.

Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Wang W, Feng X, Guo J, Chen B Respir Res. 2024; 25(1):53.

PMID: 38263145 PMC: 10807107. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-02681-w.


The dynamics of extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agent excretion into pleural and pericardial effusions quantified by T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Thalen S, Maanja M, Sigfridsson A, Maret E, Sorensson P, Ugander M J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019; 21(1):71.

PMID: 31730498 PMC: 6858732. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-019-0580-1.

References
1.
Beers S, Abramo T . Pleural effusions. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007; 23(5):330-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000270171.93485.26. View

2.
Light R . Diagnostic principles in pleural disease. Eur Respir J. 1997; 10(2):476-81. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10020476. View

3.
Nandalur K, Hardie A, Bollampally S, Parmar J, Hagspiel K . Accuracy of computed tomography attenuation values in the characterization of pleural fluid: an ROC study. Acad Radiol. 2005; 12(8):987-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.002. View

4.
Light R . Clinical practice. Pleural effusion. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(25):1971-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp010731. View

5.
Thomsen T, DeLaPena J, Setnik G . Videos in clinical medicine. Thoracentesis. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(15):e16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMvcm053812. View