SNP Discovery Using a Pangenome: Has the Single Reference Approach Become Obsolete?

Overview

Journal Biology (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biology

Date 2017 Mar 14

PMID 28287462

Citations 33

Authors

Bhavna Hurgobin

David Edwards

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that a single individual is insufficient to capture the genetic diversity within a species due to gene presence absence variation. In order to understand the extent to which genomic variation occurs in a species, the construction of its pangenome is necessary. The pangenome represents the complete set of genes of a species; it is composed of core genes, which are present in all individuals, and variable genes, which are present only in some individuals. Aside from variations at the gene level, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are also an important form of genetic variation. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) coupled with the heritability of SNPs make them ideal markers for genetic analysis of human, animal, and microbial data. SNPs have also been extensively used in crop genetics for association mapping, quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis, analysis of genetic diversity, and phylogenetic analysis. This review focuses on the use of pangenomes for SNP discovery. It highlights the advantages of using a pangenome rather than a single reference for this purpose. This review also demonstrates how extra information not captured in a single reference alone can be used to provide additional support for linking genotypic data to phenotypic data.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Recombination Rate, Reference Bias, and Unique Pangenomic Haplotypes in Using Seven De Novo Genome Assemblies.

Stack G, Quade M, Wilkerson D, Monserrate L, Bentz P, Carey S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39940933 PMC: 11818205. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031165.

The role of pangenomics in orphan crop improvement.

Hu H, Zhao J, Thomas W, Batley J, Edwards D Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):118.

PMID: 39746989 PMC: 11696220. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55260-4.

The developments and prospects of plant super-pangenomes: Demands, approaches, and applications.

He W, Li X, Qian Q, Shang L Plant Commun. 2024; 6(2):101230.

PMID: 39722458 PMC: 11897476. DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101230.

Seamless, rapid, and accurate analyses of outbreak genomic data using split -mer analysis.

Derelle R, von Wachsmann J, Maklin T, Hellewell J, Russell T, Lalvani A Genome Res. 2024; 34(10):1661-1673.

PMID: 39406504 PMC: 11529842. DOI: 10.1101/gr.279449.124.

Genomic and cell-specific regulation of benzylisoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis in opium poppy.

Hong U, Tamiru-Oli M, Hurgobin B, Lewsey M J Exp Bot. 2024; 76(1):35-51.

PMID: 39046316 PMC: 11659185. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erae317.

References

Tajima F . Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989; 123(3):585-95. PMC: 1203831. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. View

Saxena R, Edwards D, Varshney R . Structural variations in plant genomes. Brief Funct Genomics. 2014; 13(4):296-307. PMC: 4110416. DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elu016. View

Cao M, Nguyen S, Ganesamoorthy D, Elliott A, Cooper M, Coin L . Scaffolding and completing genome assemblies in real-time with nanopore sequencing. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:14515. PMC: 5321748. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14515. View

Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam T, Yiu S, Kristiansen K . SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(15):1966-7. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp336. View

Li W, Wu C, Luo C . A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol. 1985; 2(2):150-74. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040343. View

Doebley J, Gaut B, Smith B . The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell. 2006; 127(7):1309-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006. View

Cadzow M, Boocock J, Nguyen H, Wilcox P, Merriman T, Black M . A bioinformatics workflow for detecting signatures of selection in genomic data. Front Genet. 2014; 5:293. PMC: 4144660. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00293. View

Zhou Y, Burnham C, Hink T, Chen L, Shaikh N, Wollam A . Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of Clostridium difficile isolates: a single-center study. J Clin Microbiol. 2014; 52(12):4260-6. PMC: 4313296. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02115-14. View

Ao S, Yip K, Ng M, Cheung D, Fong P, Melhado I . CLUSTAG: hierarchical clustering and graph methods for selecting tag SNPs. Bioinformatics. 2004; 21(8):1735-6. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti201. View

10.

Langmead B, Salzberg S . Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(4):357-9. PMC: 3322381. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. View

11.

Prjibelski A, Vasilinetc I, Bankevich A, Gurevich A, Krivosheeva T, Nurk S . ExSPAnder: a universal repeat resolver for DNA fragment assembly. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(12):i293-301. PMC: 4058921. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu266. View

12.

Holsinger K, Weir B . Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F(ST). Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10(9):639-50. PMC: 4687486. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2611. View

13.

Biswas S, Akey J . Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends Genet. 2006; 22(8):437-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.06.005. View

14.

Li Y, Reif J, Jackson S, Ma Y, Chang R, Qiu L . Detecting SNPs underlying domestication-related traits in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2014; 14:251. PMC: 4180965. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-014-0251-1. View

15.

Li H . A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(21):2987-93. PMC: 3198575. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509. View

16.

Yang , Bielawski . Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000; 15(12):496-503. PMC: 7134603. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01994-7. View

17.

Goodwin S, McPherson J, McCombie W . Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17(6):333-51. PMC: 10373632. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.49. View

18.

SanMiguel P, Gaut B, Tikhonov A, Nakajima Y, Bennetzen J . The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize. Nat Genet. 1998; 20(1):43-5. DOI: 10.1038/1695. View

19.

Roulin A, Piegu B, Fortune P, Sabot F, DHont A, Manicacci D . Whole genome surveys of rice, maize and sorghum reveal multiple horizontal transfers of the LTR-retrotransposon Route66 in Poaceae. BMC Evol Biol. 2009; 9:58. PMC: 2664808. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-58. View

20.

Yao W, Li G, Zhao H, Wang G, Lian X, Xie W . Exploring the rice dispensable genome using a metagenome-like assembly strategy. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:187. PMC: 4583175. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0757-3. View