» Articles » PMID: 28261124

Antisocial Behavior and Interpersonal Values in High School Students

Abstract

This article analyzes the characteristics of antisocial behavior and interpersonal values of high school students () (CSE), the profile of students with high levels of antisocial behavior with regard to interpersonal values, and possible protection from antisocial behavior that interpersonal values could provide. The Interpersonal Values Questionnaire was used to assess interpersonal values, and the Antisocial-Delinquent Behaviors Questionnaire was employed to assess antisocial behaviors. The sample was made up of 885 CSE students aged 14-17. The results revealed a greater prevalence of antisocial behaviors among males and fourth-year CSE students. Moreover, antisocial behaviors were more frequent among participants with high scores in Stimulation, Recognition, Independence, and Leadership and low scores in Conformity and Benevolence. Lastly, logistic regression analyses showed that low scores in Conformity and Benevolence and high scores in Independence predicted high scores in antisocial behavior. The possibility of identifying certain interpersonal values which could positively or negatively affect the appearance of antisocial behavior during adolescence is discussed.

Citing Articles

Profiles of Maladjustment and Interpersonal Risk Factors in Adolescents.

Mendez I, Ruiz-Esteban C, Soto G, Granados Alos L, Matas-Castillo M Front Psychol. 2021; 12:686451.

PMID: 34239485 PMC: 8258374. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686451.


Moderating Effect of Family Support on the Mediated Relation Between Negative Life Events and Antisocial Behavior Tendencies Self-Esteem Among Chinese Adolescents.

Gao F, Yao Y, Yao C, Xiong Y, Ma H, Liu H Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1769.

PMID: 32903752 PMC: 7438802. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01769.


Behavioral Signatures of Values in Everyday Behavior in Retrospective and Real-Time Self-Reports.

Skimina E, Cieciuch J, Schwartz S, Davidov E, Algesheimer R Front Psychol. 2019; 10:281.

PMID: 30873064 PMC: 6401649. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00281.


Family Functioning, Emotional Intelligence, and Values: Analysis of the Relationship with Aggressive Behavior in Adolescents.

Perez-Fuentes M, Molero Jurado M, Barragan Martin A, Gazquez Linares J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(3).

PMID: 30736326 PMC: 6388189. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030478.


Gender differences in the transmission of risk for antisocial behavior problems across generations.

Li P, Becker J, Heitzeg M, McClellan M, Glover Reed B, Zucker R PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177288.

PMID: 28505162 PMC: 5432185. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177288.

References
1.
Soubelet A, Salthouse T . Influence of social desirability on age differences in self-reports of mood and personality. J Pers. 2011; 79(4):741-62. PMC: 3139822. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00700.x. View

2.
Poch F, Gonzalez Carrasco M, Garcia Moreno Y, Jane Ballabriga M, Casas Aznar F . [Disruptive behavior in adolescence and its relationship with temperament and coping styles]. Psicothema. 2012; 24(4):567-72. View

3.
Calvete E, Orue I . Cognitive schemas and aggressive behavior in adolescents: the mediating role of social information processing. Span J Psychol. 2010; 13(1):190-201. DOI: 10.1017/s1138741600003772. View

4.
Loeber R, Farrington D . Advancing knowledge about direct protective factors that may reduce youth violence. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(2 Suppl 1):S24-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.031. View

5.
Loeber R, Burke J . Developmental Pathways in Juvenile Externalizing and Internalizing Problems. J Res Adolesc. 2012; 21(1):34-46. PMC: 3314340. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00713.x. View