» Articles » PMID: 28259115

Barriers to Treatment of Failed or Interferon Ineligible Patients in the Era of DAA: Single Center Study

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Mar 6
PMID 28259115
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aims: Interferon-based treatment is not appropriate for a large number of patients with chronic hepatitis C for various medical and social reasons. Newly developed directly acting antivirals (DAAs) have been used to treat chronic hepatitis C without severe adverse effects and have achieved a sustained viral response (SVR) rate of 80-90% with short treatment duration. We were interested to determine whether all patients who failed to respond to or were ineligible for interferon-based therapy could be treated with DAAs.

Methods: Medical records of patients with positive serum anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) or HCV RNA between January 2009 and December 2013 were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected for analysis.

Results: A total of 876 patients were positive for both anti-HCV and HCV RNA. Of these, 244 patients were eligible for interferon, although this was associated with relapse in 39 (16%) of patients. In total, 130 patients stopped interferon therapy (67% adverse effects, 28% non-adherent, 4% malignancy, 1% alcohol abuse) and 502 patients were ineligible (66% medical contraindications, 25% non-adherent, 5% socioeconomic problems). Among 671 patients who were ineligible for or failed to respond to interferon therapy, more than 186 (27.7%) could not be treated with DAA due to financial, social, or cancer-related conditions.

Conclusions: Newly developed DAAs are a promising treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C who are ineligible for or failed to respond to interferon-based therapy. Nevertheless, not all chronic hepatitis C patients can be treated with DAAs due to various reasons.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of Direct-Acting Antivirals Versus Interferon-Based Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection.

Chowdhury R, Rashid W, Singh T, Rehman A, Daterdiwala N, Mkosi V Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75902.

PMID: 39830527 PMC: 11738830. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75902.


Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents and Occurrence/Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Does It Still Matter?.

Smirne C, Crobu M, Landi I, Vercellino N, Apostolo D, Pinato D Viruses. 2025; 16(12.

PMID: 39772206 PMC: 11680226. DOI: 10.3390/v16121899.


Global elimination of hepatitis C virus infection: Progresses and the remaining challenges.

Taherkhani R, Farshadpour F World J Hepatol. 2018; 9(33):1239-1252.

PMID: 29312527 PMC: 5745585. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i33.1239.

References
1.
Seong M, Kil H, Kim Y, Bae S, Lee Y, Lee H . Clinical and epidemiological features of hepatitis C virus infection in South Korea: a prospective, multicenter cohort study. J Med Virol. 2013; 85(10):1724-33. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.23661. View

2.
. KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2016; 22(1):76-139. PMC: 4825161. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2016.22.1.76. View

3.
Pawlotsky J, Feld J, Zeuzem S, Hoofnagle J . From non-A, non-B hepatitis to hepatitis C virus cure. J Hepatol. 2015; 62(1 Suppl):S87-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.006. View

4.
Narasimhan G, Sargios T, Kalakuntla R, Homel P, Clain D, Theise N . Treatment rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C after liver biopsy. J Viral Hepat. 2006; 13(11):783-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2006.00763.x. View

5.
. EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2015. J Hepatol. 2015; 63(1):199-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.025. View