» Articles » PMID: 28245491

Texture Segmentation Influences the Spatial Profile of Presaccadic Attention

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2017 Mar 1
PMID 28245491
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Attention is important for selecting targets for action. Several studies have shown that attentional selection precedes eye movements to a target, and results in an enhanced sensitivity at the saccade goal. Typically these studies have used isolated targets on blank backgrounds, which are rare in real-world situations. Here, we examine the spatial profile of sensitivity around a saccade target on a textured background and how the influence of the surrounding context develops over time. We used two textured backgrounds: a uniform texture, and a concentric arrangement of an inner and an outer texture with orthogonal orientations. For comparison, we also measured sensitivity around the target on a blank background. The spatial profile of sensitivity was measured with a brief, dim, probe flashed around the saccade target. When the target was on a blank or a uniformly textured background, spatial sensitivity peaked near the target location around 350 ms after cue onset and declined with distance from the target. However, when the background was made up of an inner and outer texture, sensitivity to the inner texture was uniformly high, peaking at about 350 ms after cue onset, suggesting that the entire inner texture was selected along with the target. The enhancement of sensitivity on the inner texture was much smaller when observers attended the target covertly and performed the probe-detection task. Thus, our results suggest that the surface representation around the target is taken into account when an observer actively plans to interact with the target.

Citing Articles

Presaccadic attention does not facilitate the detection of changes in the visual field.

Gupta P, Sridharan D PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(1):e3002485.

PMID: 38271460 PMC: 10810526. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002485.


To look or not to look: dissociating presaccadic and covert spatial attention.

Li H, Hanning N, Carrasco M Trends Neurosci. 2021; 44(8):669-686.

PMID: 34099240 PMC: 8552810. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2021.05.002.


The spatial and temporal properties of attentional selectivity for saccades and reaches.

Stewart E, Verghese P, Ma-Wyatt A J Vis. 2019; 19(9):12.

PMID: 31434108 PMC: 6707227. DOI: 10.1167/19.9.12.


Numerosity estimation benefits from transsaccadic information integration.

Hubner C, Schutz A J Vis. 2017; 17(13):12.

PMID: 29149766 PMC: 5706635. DOI: 10.1167/17.13.12.

References
1.
Kim Y, Verghese P . The selectivity of task-dependent attention varies with surrounding context. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(35):12180-91. PMC: 6621517. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5992-11.2012. View

2.
Hoffman J, Subramaniam B . The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys. 1995; 57(6):787-95. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206794. View

3.
Saenz M, Buracas G, Boynton G . Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(7):631-2. DOI: 10.1038/nn876. View

4.
Schubo A, MEINECKE C, Schroger E . Automaticity and attention: investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001; 11(3):341-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00008-8. View

5.
Li Z . Visual segmentation by contextual influences via intra-cortical interactions in the primary visual cortex. Network. 1999; 10(2):187-212. View