» Articles » PMID: 22933800

The Selectivity of Task-dependent Attention Varies with Surrounding Context

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Aug 31
PMID 22933800
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Attention is thought to operate by enhancing the target of interest and suppressing the surroundings. We hypothesized that the spatial profile of attention depends on the surround's relationship to the target. Using high-density electroencephalographic measurements, we examined the spatial profile of attention to a grating target surrounded by an annular grating that was either coextensive with the target (unsegmented) or appeared segmented from it due to a gap or phase offset. We directly probed the spread of attention from the central target into the surround by flickering the surround and monitoring frequency-tagged steady-state visual-evoked potentials. Observers were required to detect a contrast increment that occurred only on the target. Successful detection of the increment required selecting the target and suppressing the surround, particularly when the target did not readily segment from the surround. The profile of attention was investigated in five visual regions of interest (ROIs) (V1, V4, V3A, lateral occipital complex, and human middle temporal area), mapped in a separate anatomical magnetic resonance imaging scan. We found that in most ROIs, attention to the target generated smaller responses from the surrounding annulus when it was contiguous compared with when it was clearly segmented. This result shows that the profile of attention depends on task demands and on surrounding context; attention is tightly focused when the target region needs to be isolated but loosely focused when the target region is clearly segmented.

Citing Articles

Automatic detection of standing dead trees based on improved YOLOv7 from airborne remote sensing imagery.

Zhou H, Wu S, Xu Z, Sun H Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1278161.

PMID: 38318496 PMC: 10839092. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1278161.


The SSVEP tracks attention, not consciousness, during perceptual filling-in.

Davidson M, Mithen W, Hogendoorn H, van Boxtel J, Tsuchiya N Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 33170121 PMC: 7682990. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.60031.


A multiple-response frequency-tagging paradigm measures graded changes in consciousness during perceptual filling-in.

Davidson M, Graafsma I, Tsuchiya N, van Boxtel J Neurosci Conscious. 2020; 2020(1):niaa002.

PMID: 32296545 PMC: 7151726. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niaa002.


Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Itthipuripat S, Sprague T, Serences J J Neurosci. 2019; 39(31):6162-6179.

PMID: 31127004 PMC: 6668200. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2519-18.2019.


Attention to Multiple Objects Facilitates Their Integration in Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex.

Kim Y, Tsai J, Ojemann J, Verghese P J Neurosci. 2017; 37(19):4942-4953.

PMID: 28411268 PMC: 5426182. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2370-16.2017.


References
1.
Brefczynski J, Deyoe E . A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(4):370-4. DOI: 10.1038/7280. View

2.
Pei F, Pettet M, Norcia A . Neural correlates of object-based attention. J Vis. 2003; 2(9):588-96. DOI: 10.1167/2.9.1. View

3.
Muller N, Kleinschmidt A . The attentional 'spotlight's' penumbra: center-surround modulation in striate cortex. Neuroreport. 2004; 15(6):977-80. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200404290-00009. View

4.
Wandell B, Brewer A, Dougherty R . Visual field map clusters in human cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005; 360(1456):693-707. PMC: 1569486. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1628. View

5.
Kim Y, Grabowecky M, Paller K, Muthu K, Suzuki S . Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 10(1):117-25. DOI: 10.1038/nn1821. View