» Articles » PMID: 28224239

The Importance of Electrode Position in Visual Electrophysiology

Overview
Journal Doc Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2017 Feb 23
PMID 28224239
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The DTL fibre electrode is commonly used to record the electric potentials elicited by stimulation of the retina. Two positions are commonly used: it is placed either on the cornea along the lower lid or in the conjunctival fornix. The PERG and OPs have previously been examined and compared under both conditions. The aim of this study was to examine the ERG, flicker response and on-off responses with differing electrode positions.

Methods: Before recruitment, all subjects underwent an ophthalmological examination. We enrolled 13 normal control subjects into the study aged 13-64 years, all with a visual acuity of ≥1.0. We recorded scotopic and photopic ERGs, flicker and on-off responses, for both electrode positions. On the first day, one eye had the electrode placed on the cornea along the lower lid and the other eye had it positioned in the conjunctival sac. On a second day, the recordings were repeated with the alternative electrode placements.

Results: ERG, on-off and flicker responses were all smaller by between 20 and 25% when the DTL electrode was positioned in the conjunctival sac, compared to when it was positioned on the cornea, as did the scatter in the data points. This indicates that there is no advantage clinically for one or the other placement.

Conclusions: Our results confirm other reports examining the effect of electrode position on electrophysiological potentials. When recording with the DTL electrode, it is important to ensure that it is placed at the same position in repeat recordings or in multicentre trials and that it is stable and does not move during recording.

Citing Articles

The Electroretinogram I-Wave, a Component Originating in the Retinal OFF-Pathway, Associates With a Myopia Genetic Risk Polymorphism.

Xu Z, Tan J, Vetrivel K, Jiang X, Leo S, Bhatti T Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(13):21.

PMID: 39530998 PMC: 11562975. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.13.21.


The Variety of Mechanosensitive Ion Channels in Retinal Neurons.

Pang J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(9).

PMID: 38732096 PMC: 11084373. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094877.


Full-field electroretinogram recorded with skin electrodes in 6- to 12-year-old children.

Wang J, Wang Y, Guan W, Zhao Y Doc Ophthalmol. 2023; 147(3):179-188.

PMID: 37530953 PMC: 10638173. DOI: 10.1007/s10633-023-09944-9.


Electrical responses from human retinal cone pathways associate with a common genetic polymorphism implicated in myopia.

Jiang X, Xu Z, Soorma T, Tariq A, Bhatti T, Baneke A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(21):e2119675119.

PMID: 35594404 PMC: 9173800. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2119675119.


Electrophysiological Assessment in Birdshot Chorioretinopathy: Flicker Electroretinograms Recorded With a Handheld Device.

Waldie A, Hobby A, Chow I, Cornish E, Indusegaran M, Pekacka A Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(5):23.

PMID: 35594040 PMC: 9145202. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.5.23.


References
1.
Kothe A, Lovasik J, Coupland S . Variability in clinically measured photopic oscillatory potentials. Doc Ophthalmol. 1989; 71(4):381-95. DOI: 10.1007/BF00152765. View

2.
Dawson W, Trick G, Litzkow C . Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979; 18(9):988-91. View

3.
Rotenstreich Y, Fishman G, Anderson R, Birch D . Interocular amplitude differences of the full field electroretinogram in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87(10):1268-71. PMC: 1920781. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.87.10.1268. View

4.
Thompson D, Drasdo N . Computation of the luminance and pattern components of the bar pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 1987; 66(3):233-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF00145237. View

5.
Hebert M, Lachapelle P, Dumont M . Reproducibility of electroretinograms recorded with DTL electrodes. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995; 91(4):333-42. DOI: 10.1007/BF01214651. View