» Articles » PMID: 34545392

Perspective: Opportunities and Challenges of Technology Tools in Dietary and Activity Assessment: Bridging Stakeholder Viewpoints

Overview
Journal Adv Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Sep 21
PMID 34545392
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The science and tools of measuring energy intake and output in humans have rapidly advanced in the last decade. Engineered devices such as wearables and sensors, software applications, and Web-based tools are now ubiquitous in both research and consumer environments. The assessment of energy expenditure in particular has progressed from reliance on self-report instruments to advanced technologies requiring collaboration across multiple disciplines, from optics to accelerometry. In contrast, assessing energy intake still heavily relies on self-report mechanisms. Although these tools have improved, moving from paper-based to online reporting, considerable room for refinement remains in existing tools, and great opportunities exist for novel, transformational tools, including those using spectroscopy and chemo-sensing. This report reviews the state of the science, and the opportunities and challenges in existing and emerging technologies, from the perspectives of 3 key stakeholders: researchers, users, and developers. Each stakeholder approaches these tools with unique requirements: researchers are concerned with validity, accuracy, data detail and abundance, and ethical use; users with ease of use and privacy; and developers with high adherence and utilization, intellectual property, licensing rights, and monetization. Cross-cutting concerns include frequent updating and integration of the food and nutrient databases on which assessments rely, improving accessibility and reducing disparities in use, and maintaining reliable technical assistance. These contextual challenges are discussed in terms of opportunities and further steps in the direction of personalized health.

Citing Articles

Investigation and Assessment of AI's Role in Nutrition-An Updated Narrative Review of the Evidence.

Kassem H, Beevi A, Basheer S, Lutfi G, Ismail L, Papandreou D Nutrients. 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796624 PMC: 11723148. DOI: 10.3390/nu17010190.


Comparing Self-Reported Dietary Intake to Provided Diet during a Randomized Controlled Feeding Intervention: A Pilot Study.

Casey J, Meijer J, IglayReger H, Ball S, Han-Markey T, Braun T Dietetics (Basel). 2023; 2(4):334-343.

PMID: 38107624 PMC: 10722558. DOI: 10.3390/dietetics2040024.


Count Every Bite to Make "Every Bite Count": Measurement Gaps and Future Directions for Assessing Diet From Birth to 24 Months.

Zimmer M, Obbagy J, Scanlon K, Gibbs K, Lerman J, Hamner H J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023; 123(9):1269-1279.e1.

PMID: 37196980 PMC: 10809843. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.05.011.


Relative Validity and Reliability of the Remind App as an Image-Based Method to Assess Dietary Intake and Meal Timing in Young Adults.

Ramirez-Contreras C, Farran-Codina A, Zeron-Rugerio M, Izquierdo-Pulido M Nutrients. 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37111043 PMC: 10146256. DOI: 10.3390/nu15081824.


Multiomics Approach to Precision Sports Nutrition: Limits, Challenges, and Possibilities.

Nieman D Front Nutr. 2021; 8:796360.

PMID: 34970584 PMC: 8712338. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.796360.

References
1.
Albrecht B, Stalling I, Recke C, Bammann K . Accelerometer-assessed outdoor physical activity is associated with meteorological conditions among older adults: Cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study. PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0228053. PMC: 6980536. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228053. View

2.
Kissileff H, Klingsberg G, Van Itallie T . Universal eating monitor for continuous recording of solid or liquid consumption in man. Am J Physiol. 1980; 238(1):R14-22. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1980.238.1.R14. View

3.
Muller A, Maher C, Vandelanotte C, Hingle M, Middelweerd A, Lopez M . Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Diet-Related eHealth and mHealth Research: Bibliometric Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(4):e122. PMC: 5932335. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8954. View

4.
Arens-Volland A, Spassova L, Bohn T . Promising approaches of computer-supported dietary assessment and management-Current research status and available applications. Int J Med Inform. 2015; 84(12):997-1008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.08.006. View

5.
Narayanan A, Desai F, Stewart T, Duncan S, Mackay L . Application of Raw Accelerometer Data and Machine-Learning Techniques to Characterize Human Movement Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review. J Phys Act Health. 2020; 17(3):360-383. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0088. View