» Articles » PMID: 28163878

Foraging in an Unsteady World: Bumblebee Flight Performance in Field-realistic Turbulence

Overview
Journal Interface Focus
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Feb 7
PMID 28163878
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Natural environments are characterized by variable wind that can pose significant challenges for flying animals and robots. However, our understanding of the flow conditions that animals experience outdoors and how these impact flight performance remains limited. Here, we combine laboratory and field experiments to characterize wind conditions encountered by foraging bumblebees in outdoor environments and test the effects of these conditions on flight. We used radio-frequency tags to track foraging activity of uniquely identified bumblebee () workers, while simultaneously recording local wind flows. Despite being subjected to a wide range of speeds and turbulence intensities, we find that bees do not avoid foraging in windy conditions. We then examined the impacts of turbulence on bumblebee flight in a wind tunnel. Rolling instabilities increased in turbulence, but only at higher wind speeds. Bees displayed higher mean wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude in these conditions, as well as increased asymmetry in stroke amplitude-suggesting that bees employ an array of active responses to enable flight in turbulence, which may increase the energetic cost of flight. Our results provide the first direct evidence that moderate, environmentally relevant turbulence affects insect flight performance, and suggest that flying insects use diverse mechanisms to cope with these instabilities.

Citing Articles

Wind gates olfaction-driven search states in free flight.

Stupski S, van Breugel F Curr Biol. 2024; 34(19):4397-4411.e6.

PMID: 39067453 PMC: 11461137. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.07.009.


Generating controlled gust perturbations using vortex rings.

Gupta D, Sane S, Arakeri J PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305084.

PMID: 38976706 PMC: 11230548. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305084.


Bumblebees compensate for the adverse effects of sidewind during visually guided landings.

Goyal P, van Leeuwen J, Muijres F J Exp Biol. 2024; 227(8).

PMID: 38506223 PMC: 11112349. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.245432.


Turbulence causes kinematic and behavioural adjustments in a flapping flier.

Lempidakis E, Ross A, Quetting M, Krishnan K, Garde B, Wikelski M J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(212):20230591.

PMID: 38503340 PMC: 10950466. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0591.


An Aerial-Wall Robotic Insect That Can Land, Climb, and Take Off from Vertical Surfaces.

Li Q, Li H, Shen H, Yu Y, He H, Feng X Research (Wash D C). 2023; 6:0144.

PMID: 37228637 PMC: 10204747. DOI: 10.34133/research.0144.


References
1.
Ma K, Chirarattananon P, Fuller S, Wood R . Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science. 2013; 340(6132):603-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1231806. View

2.
Greenleaf S, Williams N, Winfree R, Kremen C . Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia. 2007; 153(3):589-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9. View

3.
Engels T, Kolomenskiy D, Schneider K, Lehmann F, Sesterhenn J . Bumblebee Flight in Heavy Turbulence. Phys Rev Lett. 2016; 116(2):028103. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.028103. View

4.
Schwegmann A, Lindemann J, Egelhaaf M . Depth information in natural environments derived from optic flow by insect motion detection system: a model analysis. Front Comput Neurosci. 2014; 8:83. PMC: 4118023. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2014.00083. View

5.
Ortega-Jimenez V, Sapir N, Wolf M, Variano E, Dudley R . Into turbulent air: size-dependent effects of von Kármán vortex streets on hummingbird flight kinematics and energetics. Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1783):20140180. PMC: 3996613. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0180. View