» Articles » PMID: 28133549

A Maximum Muscle Strength Prediction Formula Using Theoretical Grade 3 Muscle Strength Value in Daniels Et Al.'s Manual Muscle Test, in Consideration of Age: An Investigation of Hip and Knee Joint Flexion and Extension

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Jan 31
PMID 28133549
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study attempted to develop a formula for predicting maximum muscle strength value for young, middle-aged, and elderly adults using theoretical Grade 3 muscle strength value (moment fair: )-the static muscular moment to support a limb segment against gravity-from the manual muscle test by Daniels et al. A total of 130 healthy Japanese individuals divided by age group performed isometric muscle contractions at maximum effort for various movements of hip joint flexion and extension and knee joint flexion and extension, and the accompanying resisting force was measured and maximum muscle strength value (moment max, ) was calculated. Body weight and limb segment length (thigh and lower leg length) were measured, and was calculated using anthropometric measures and theoretical calculation. There was a linear correlation between and in each of the four movement types in all groups, excepting knee flexion in elderly. However, the formula for predicting maximum muscle strength was not sufficiently compatible in middle-aged and elderly adults, suggesting that the formula obtained in this study is applicable in young adults only.

Citing Articles

Validity and reliability of isometric knee extension muscle strength measurements using a belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometer: a comparison with the measurement using an isokinetic dynamometer in a sitting posture.

Hirano M, Katoh M, Gomi M, Arai S J Phys Ther Sci. 2020; 32(2):120-124.

PMID: 32158074 PMC: 7032982. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.32.120.

References
1.
Fukunaga T, Miyatani M, Tachi M, Kouzaki M, Kawakami Y, Kanehisa H . Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001; 172(4):249-55. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-201x.2001.00867.x. View

2.
Dvir Z . Grade 4 in manual muscle testing: the problem with submaximal strength assessment. Clin Rehabil. 1997; 11(1):36-41. DOI: 10.1177/026921559701100106. View

3.
Young A, Stokes M, Crowe M . The size and strength of the quadriceps muscles of old and young men. Clin Physiol. 1985; 5(2):145-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1985.tb00590.x. View

4.
Mulroy S, Lassen K, Chambers S, Perry J . The ability of male and female clinicians to effectively test knee extension strength using manual muscle testing. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997; 26(4):192-9. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1997.26.4.192. View

5.
Li R, Jasiewicz J, Middleton J, Condie P, Barriskill A, Hebnes H . The development, validity, and reliability of a manual muscle testing device with integrated limb position sensors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(3):411-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.011. View