» Articles » PMID: 28125585

The Flash-Lag Effect As a Motion-Based Predictive Shift

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Jan 27
PMID 28125585
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to its inherent neural delays, the visual system has an outdated access to sensory information about the current position of moving objects. In contrast, living organisms are remarkably able to track and intercept moving objects under a large range of challenging environmental conditions. Physiological, behavioral and psychophysical evidences strongly suggest that position coding is extrapolated using an explicit and reliable representation of object's motion but it is still unclear how these two representations interact. For instance, the so-called flash-lag effect supports the idea of a differential processing of position between moving and static objects. Although elucidating such mechanisms is crucial in our understanding of the dynamics of visual processing, a theory is still missing to explain the different facets of this visual illusion. Here, we reconsider several of the key aspects of the flash-lag effect in order to explore the role of motion upon neural coding of objects' position. First, we formalize the problem using a Bayesian modeling framework which includes a graded representation of the degree of belief about visual motion. We introduce a motion-based prediction model as a candidate explanation for the perception of coherent motion. By including the knowledge of a fixed delay, we can model the dynamics of sensory information integration by extrapolating the information acquired at previous instants in time. Next, we simulate the optimal estimation of object position with and without delay compensation and compared it with human perception under a broad range of different psychophysical conditions. Our computational study suggests that the explicit, probabilistic representation of velocity information is crucial in explaining position coding, and therefore the flash-lag effect. We discuss these theoretical results in light of the putative corrective mechanisms that can be used to cancel out the detrimental effects of neural delays and illuminate the more general question of the dynamical representation at the present time of spatial information in the visual pathways.

Citing Articles

Corrective mechanisms of motion extrapolation.

Wang X, Song Y, Liao M, Liu T, Liu L, Reynaud A J Vis. 2024; 24(3):6.

PMID: 38512248 PMC: 10960225. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.3.6.


Dynamic predictive coding: A model of hierarchical sequence learning and prediction in the neocortex.

Jiang L, Rao R PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(2):e1011801.

PMID: 38330098 PMC: 10880975. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011801.


Learning heterogeneous delays in a layer of spiking neurons for fast motion detection.

Grimaldi A, Perrinet L Biol Cybern. 2023; 117(4-5):373-387.

PMID: 37695359 DOI: 10.1007/s00422-023-00975-8.


Spike-timing dependent plasticity partially compensates for neural delays in a multi-layered network of motion-sensitive neurons.

Sexton C, Burkitt A, Hogendoorn H PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(9):e1011457.

PMID: 37672532 PMC: 10506708. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011457.


Tuning curves vs. population responses, and perceptual consequences of receptive-field remapping.

Qian N, Goldberg M, Zhang M Front Comput Neurosci. 2023; 16:1060757.

PMID: 36714528 PMC: 9880053. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2022.1060757.


References
1.
Wojtach W, Sung K, Truong S, Purves D . An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(42):16338-43. PMC: 2566991. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808916105. View

2.
Franklin D, Wolpert D . Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron. 2011; 72(3):425-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.006. View

3.
Jancke D, Erlhagen W, Schoner G, Dinse H . Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex. J Physiol. 2004; 556(Pt 3):971-82. PMC: 1665003. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.058941. View

4.
Khoei M, Masson G, Perrinet L . Motion-based prediction explains the role of tracking in motion extrapolation. J Physiol Paris. 2013; 107(5):409-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.08.001. View

5.
Maus G, Weigelt S, Nijhawan R, Muckli L . Does Area V3A Predict Positions of Moving Objects?. Front Psychol. 2011; 1:186. PMC: 3158432. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00186. View