» Articles » PMID: 28112693

Laparotomic Vs Laparoscopic Ovariectomy: Comparing the Two Methods. The Ovariectomy in the Bitch in Laparoscopic Era

Overview
Journal Acta Biomed
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Jan 24
PMID 28112693
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: The aim of the present work is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of ultrasound scalpel during laparoscopic ovariectomy in the bitch.

Methods: Two groups of 10 subjects each, of different races and ages, were compared. In the first group, ovariectomy was performed laparoscopically, using harmonic scalpel to remove ovary. In the second group surgery was performed by means of classical laparotomy.

Results: Pre-operative time was similar in both groups. Total operative time, from incision to skin suture, showed significant difference between the two groups, being laparoscopy faster than laparotomy. Partial operative time for bilateral oophorectomy resulted lower using open technique, but, considering each ovary, there was no significant difference in both groups.

Conclusions: The use of harmonic scalpel to perform ovariectomy during laparoscopy is an effective time-sparing surgical approach compared to the already great practicality of laparotomy.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic versus Open Ovariectomy in Bitches: Changes in Cardiorespiratory Values, Blood Parameters, and Sevoflurane Requirements Associated with the Surgical Technique.

Fernandez-Martin S, Valino-Cultelli V, Gonzalez-Cantalapiedra A Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 35681900 PMC: 9179476. DOI: 10.3390/ani12111438.


Changes in Acute Phase Proteins in Bitches after Laparoscopic, Midline, and Flank Ovariectomy Using the Same Method for Hemostasis.

Del Romero A, Cuervo B, Pelaez P, Miguel L, Torres M, Yeste M Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(12).

PMID: 33260846 PMC: 7761362. DOI: 10.3390/ani10122223.


Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.

Giampaolino P, De Rosa N, Morra I, Bertrando A, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zizolfi B Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:6486407.

PMID: 29693012 PMC: 5859871. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6486407.

References
1.
Tirelli G, Carolina Del Piero G, Perrino F . Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel in oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013; 42(5):544-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.07.024. View

2.
Barzan L, Antonio J, Santini S, Di Carlo R, Savignano M, Politi D . Submandibular approach and use of the harmonic instrument in lateral oral cavity and oropharyngeal oncologic surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011; 30(6):277-80. PMC: 3146320. View

3.
Lombardo C, Damiano G, Cassata G, Palumbo V, Cacciabaudo F, Spinelii G . Surgical vascular access in the porcine model for long-term repeated blood sampling. Acta Biomed. 2011; 81(2):101-3. View

4.
Dupre G, Fiorbianco V, Skalicky M, Gultiken N, Ay S, Findik M . Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: comparison between single portal and two-portal access. Vet Surg. 2009; 38(7):818-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00601.x. View

5.
Bubalo V, Moens Y, Holzmann A, Coppens P . Anaesthetic sparing effect of local anaesthesia of the ovarian pedicle during ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008; 35(6):537-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00421.x. View