» Articles » PMID: 21808446

Submandibular Approach and Use of the Harmonic Instrument in Lateral Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Oncologic Surgery

Overview
Date 2011 Aug 3
PMID 21808446
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The approach to the surgical treatment of lateral oral cavity and oro-pharyngeal cancer has undergone many changes over the years, passing from a demolitive approach involving segmental resectioning of the mandible to a conservative approach with temporary mandibulotomy. The complications resulting from these two different approaches invited further review of the various indications related to them. The present report considers, through a retrospective analysis, whether the sub-mandibular approach, which envisages the use of the harmonic instrument, is an oncologically correct alternative and whether it actually reduces the number of early and late complications. From 2003 to 2009, 259 patients underwent surgery for lateral oral cavity and oro-pharyngeal cancer. A sub-mandibular approach was used in 163 patients, and a conservative trans-mandibular approach in 12. The results showed that the number of late complications and T recurrences was significantly lower in those patients in whom the sub-mandibular approach was carried out. There was no difference in the microscopic examination of the resection margins. The use of the harmonic instrument made it possible to perform "en bloc" (T+N) operations working in narrow spaces with less intra-operative bleeding, which contributed to adequate oncological radicality.

Citing Articles

Level I Nodal Positivity as a Factor for Involvement of the Submandibular Gland in Oral Cavity Carcinoma: A Case Series Report.

Pasha H, Dhanani R, Ghaloo S, Ghias K, Khan M Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 25(2):e279-e283.

PMID: 33968233 PMC: 8096506. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709117.


Barbed suture in oral cavity reconstruction: preliminary results.

Crosetti E, Caracciolo A, Arrigoni G, Delmastro E, Succo G Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019; 39(5):308-315.

PMID: 30745594 PMC: 6843584. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-2130.


Laparotomic vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: comparing the two methods. The ovariectomy in the bitch in laparoscopic era.

Cassata G, Palumbo V, Cicero L, Damiano G, Maenza A, Migliazzo A Acta Biomed. 2017; 87(3):271-274.

PMID: 28112693 PMC: 10521885.


Is it necessary to remove submandibular glands in squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity?.

Basaran B, Ulusan M, Orhan K, Gunes S, Suoglu Y Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013; 33(2):88-92.

PMID: 23853397 PMC: 3665381.

References
1.
Jackson L, Gourin C, Thomas D, Porubsky E, Klippert F, Terris D . Use of the harmonic scalpel in superficial and total parotidectomy for benign and malignant disease. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115(6):1070-3. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163336.37077.8F. View

2.
Taub D, Tursun R, Gold L, Jamal B . Nonunion of mandibular midline osteotomy after tumor surgery and radiation repaired by endosseous implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68(4):833-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.039. View

3.
Devine J, Rogers S, McNally D, Brown J, Vaughan E . A comparison of aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes following lip-split mandibulotomy and mandibular lingual releasing access procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 30(3):199-204. DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0038. View

4.
Kos M, Engelke W . Advantages of a new technique of neck dissection using an ultrasonic scalpel. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007; 35(1):10-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.10.007. View

5.
Shah J, Gil Z . Current concepts in management of oral cancer--surgery. Oral Oncol. 2008; 45(4-5):394-401. PMC: 4130348. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.017. View