A Universally Acceptable View on the Adoption of Improved Plant Breeding Techniques

Overview

Journal Front Plant Sci

Date 2017 Jan 21

PMID 28105036

Citations 2

Authors

Dennis Eriksson

Klaus H Ammann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Shotguns vs Lasers: Identifying barriers and facilitators to scaling-up plant molecular farming for high-value health products.

Menary J, Hobbs M, Mesquita de Albuquerque S, Pacho A, Drake P, Prendiville A PLoS One. 2020; 15(3):e0229952.

PMID: 32196508 PMC: 7083274. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229952.

Responsible decision-making for plant research and breeding innovations in the European Union.

Eriksson D, Chatzopoulou S GM Crops Food. 2017; 9(1):39-44.

PMID: 28991508 PMC: 5927680. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2017.1388496.

References

Podevin N, Devos Y, Davies H, Nielsen K . Transgenic or not? No simple answer! New biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape. EMBO Rep. 2012; 13(12):1057-61. PMC: 3512411. DOI: 10.1038/embor.2012.168. View

Batista R, Saibo N, Lourenco T, Oliveira M . Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(9):3640-5. PMC: 2265136. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707881105. View

Arber W . Genetic engineering compared to natural genetic variations. N Biotechnol. 2010; 27(5):517-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.007. View

Wolt J, Wang K, Yang B . The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015; 14(2):510-8. PMC: 5042095. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12444. View

Catchpole G, Beckmann M, Enot D, Mondhe M, Zywicki B, Taylor J . Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(40):14458-62. PMC: 1242293. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0503955102. View

Kyndt T, Quispe D, Zhai H, Jarret R, Ghislain M, Liu Q . The genome of cultivated sweet potato contains Agrobacterium T-DNAs with expressed genes: An example of a naturally transgenic food crop. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(18):5844-9. PMC: 4426443. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419685112. View

Martin-Ortigosa S, Peterson D, Valenstein J, Lin V, Trewyn B, Lyznik L . Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-mediated intracellular cre protein delivery for maize genome editing via loxP site excision. Plant Physiol. 2013; 164(2):537-47. PMC: 3912087. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.233650. View

Conko G, Kershen D, Miller H, Parrott W . A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(5):493-503. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3568. View

Tagliabue G . The meaningless pseudo-category of "GMOs": The trouble with the "new techniques" for genetically modifying crops demonstrates the illogical process-based definition of GMOs in EU regulation. EMBO Rep. 2015; 17(1):10-3. PMC: 4718412. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201541385. View

10.

Kuzma J . Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering. Nature. 2016; 531(7593):165-7. DOI: 10.1038/531165a. View

11.

Huang S, Weigel D, Beachy R, Li J . A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(2):109-11. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3484. View

12.

Mattick J, Taft R, Faulkner G . A global view of genomic information--moving beyond the gene and the master regulator. Trends Genet. 2009; 26(1):21-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.11.002. View

13.

Bahal R, Ali McNeer N, Quijano E, Liu Y, Sulkowski P, Turchick A . In vivo correction of anaemia in β-thalassemic mice by γPNA-mediated gene editing with nanoparticle delivery. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:13304. PMC: 5095181. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13304. View

14.

Ricroch A, Ammann K, Kuntz M . Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing: The use of genome editing technologies in plant breeding requires a novel regulatory approach for new plant varieties that involves farmers. EMBO Rep. 2016; 17(10):1365-1369. PMC: 5048372. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201643099. View