» Articles » PMID: 28096648

Identification of Genetic and Epigenetic Variants Associated with Breast Cancer Prognosis by Integrative Bioinformatics Analysis

Overview
Journal Cancer Inform
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2017 Jan 19
PMID 28096648
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer being a multifaceted disease constitutes a wide spectrum of histological and molecular variability in tumors. However, the task for the identification of these variances is complicated by the interplay between inherited genetic and epigenetic aberrations. Therefore, this study provides an extrapolate outlook to the sinister partnership between DNA methylation and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in relevance to the identification of prognostic markers in breast cancer. The effect of these SNPs on methylation is defined as methylation quantitative trait loci (meQTL).

Materials And Methods: We developed a novel method to identify prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer by integrating genomic and epigenomic data. This is based on the hypothesis that multiple sources of evidence pointing to the same gene or pathway are likely to lead to reduced false positives. We also apply random resampling to reduce overfitting noise by dividing samples into training and testing data sets. Specifically, the common samples between Illumina 450 DNA methylation, Affymetrix SNP array, and clinical data sets obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) were randomly divided into training and test models. An intensive statistical analysis based on log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model has established a significant association between differential methylation and the stratification of breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups, respectively.

Results: The comprehensive assessment based on the conjoint effect of CpG-SNP pair has guided in delaminating the breast cancer patients into the high- and low-risk groups. In particular, the most significant association was found with respect to cg05370838-rs2230576, cg00956490-rs940453, and cg11340537-rs2640785 CpG-SNP pairs. These CpG-SNP pairs were strongly associated with differential expression of , , and genes, respectively. Besides, the exclusive effect of SNPs such as rs10101376, rs140679, and rs1538146 also hold significant prognostic determinant.

Conclusions: Thus, the analysis based on DNA methylation and SNPs have resulted in the identification of novel susceptible loci that hold prognostic relevance in breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Hypomethylation at H19DMR in penile squamous cell carcinoma is not related to HPV infection.

da Silva Santos R, Pinheiro D, Hirth C, Bezerra M, Silva-Fernandes I, da Silva Oliveira F Epigenetics. 2024; 19(1):2305081.

PMID: 38245880 PMC: 10802203. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2024.2305081.


Susceptibility to hypertension based on rs1801133 single nucleotide polymorphism and promoter methylation.

Chiu M, Chang C, Tantoh D, Hsu T, Hsiao C, Zhong J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1159764.

PMID: 37849939 PMC: 10577234. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1159764.


Involvement of CCCTC-binding factor in epigenetic regulation of cancer.

Bose S, Saha S, Goswami H, Shanmugam G, Sarkar K Mol Biol Rep. 2023; 50(12):10383-10398.

PMID: 37840067 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08879-3.


Interaction between a diabetes-related methylation site (TXNIP cg19693031) and variant (GLUT1 rs841853) on fasting blood glucose levels among non-diabetics.

Tsai H, Shen C, Ho C, Hsu S, Tantoh D, Nfor O J Transl Med. 2022; 20(1):87.

PMID: 35164795 PMC: 8842527. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03269-y.


Can the epigenome contribute to risk stratification for cancer onset?.

Lelievre S NAR Cancer. 2021; 3(4):zcab043.

PMID: 34734185 PMC: 8559165. DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcab043.


References
1.
Stirzaker C, Zotenko E, Song J, Qu W, Nair S, Locke W . Methylome sequencing in triple-negative breast cancer reveals distinct methylation clusters with prognostic value. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:5899. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6899. View

2.
Romagnoli M, Mineva N, Polmear M, Conrad C, Srinivasan S, Loussouarn D . ADAM8 expression in invasive breast cancer promotes tumor dissemination and metastasis. EMBO Mol Med. 2013; 6(2):278-94. PMC: 3927960. DOI: 10.1002/emmm.201303373. View

3.
Li S, Zhu S, Wan X, Xu Z, Ma Z . Neutralization of ADAM8 ameliorates liver injury and accelerates liver repair in carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury. J Toxicol Sci. 2014; 39(2):339-51. DOI: 10.2131/jts.39.339. View

4.
Fackler M, Umbricht C, Williams D, Argani P, Cruz L, Merino V . Genome-wide methylation analysis identifies genes specific to breast cancer hormone receptor status and risk of recurrence. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(19):6195-207. PMC: 3308629. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1630. View

5.
Su W, Shugart Y, Chang K, Tsang N, Tse K, Chang Y . How genome-wide SNP-SNP interactions relate to nasopharyngeal carcinoma susceptibility. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e83034. PMC: 3871583. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083034. View