» Articles » PMID: 28093422

GPs' Perceptions of Workload in England: a Qualitative Interview Study

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Jan 18
PMID 28093422
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: GPs report the lowest levels of morale among doctors, job satisfaction is low, and the GP workforce is diminishing. Workload is frequently cited as negatively impacting on commitment to a career in general practice, and many GPs report that their workload is unmanageable.

Aim: To gather an in-depth understanding of GPs' perceptions and attitudes towards workload.

Design And Setting: All GPs working within NHS England were eligible. Advertisements were circulated via regional GP e-mail lists and national social media networks in June 2015. Of those GPs who responded, a maximum-variation sample was selected until data saturation was reached.

Method: Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: In total, 171 GPs responded, and 34 were included in this study. GPs described an increase in workload over recent years, with current working days being long and intense, raising concerns over the wellbeing of GPs and patients. Full-time partnership was generally not considered to be possible, and many participants felt workload was unsustainable, particularly given the diminishing workforce. Four major themes emerged to explain increased workload: increased patient needs and expectations; a changing relationship between primary and secondary care; bureaucracy and resources; and the balance of workload within a practice. Continuity of care was perceived as being eroded by changes in contracts and working patterns to deal with workload.

Conclusion: This study highlights the urgent need to address perceived lack of investment and clinical capacity in general practice, and suggests that managing patient expectations around what primary care can deliver, and reducing bureaucracy, have become key issues, at least until capacity issues are resolved.

Citing Articles

Approaches to Reach Trustworthy Patient Education: A Narrative Review.

Lyu X, Li J, Li S Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(23).

PMID: 39684944 PMC: 11641738. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12232322.


Psychosocial work environment in Swedish primary healthcare: a cross-sectional survey of physicians' job satisfaction, turnover intention, social support, leadership climate and change fatigue.

Fernemark H, Karlsson N, Skagerstrom J, Seing I, Karlsson E, Brulin E Hum Resour Health. 2024; 22(1):70.

PMID: 39443998 PMC: 11500482. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-024-00955-4.


GP workload and patient safety.

Khan N Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 74(746):412-413.

PMID: 39209712 PMC: 11349371. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp24X739257.


Understanding general practitioner and pharmacist preferences for pharmacogenetic testing in primary care: a discrete choice experiment.

McDermott J, Sharma V, Beaman G, Keen J, Newman W, Wilson P Pharmacogenomics J. 2024; 24(5):25.

PMID: 39122683 PMC: 11315669. DOI: 10.1038/s41397-024-00344-z.


Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.

Sinnott C, Ansari A, Price E, Fisher R, Beech J, Alderwick H Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 74(747):e683-e694.

PMID: 38936884 PMC: 11441605. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0033.


References
1.
Ahluwalia S, Offredy M . A qualitative study of the impact of the implementation of advanced access in primary healthcare on the working lives of general practice staff. BMC Fam Pract. 2005; 6:39. PMC: 1249563. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-39. View

2.
Campbell J, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt T, Lattimer V . Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014; 384(9957):1859-1868. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61058-8. View

3.
Iversen L, Farmer J, Hannaford P . Workload pressures in rural general practice: a qualitative investigation. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002; 20(3):139-44. DOI: 10.1080/028134302760234573. View

4.
Appleby J . Is general practice in trouble?. BMJ. 2014; 349:g6814. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g6814. View

5.
Doran N, Fox F, Rodham K, Taylor G, Harris M . Lost to the NHS: a mixed methods study of why GPs leave practice early in England. Br J Gen Pract. 2016; 66(643):e128-35. PMC: 4723211. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X683425. View