» Articles » PMID: 28086215

Predictive Value of Glucose Transporter-1 and Glucose Transporter-3 for Survival of Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Jan 14
PMID 28086215
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: The role of glucose transporters in cancers remains contradictory. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between overall survival and glucose transporter s (GLUTs) 1 and 3 to find an accurate prognostic biomarker.

Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, EMbase and Medline databases for relevant published studies that were consistent with the eligible criteria up to January 2016, and calculated pooled estimated hazard ratios of GLUT-1 and -3's expressions in different cancer types and ethnic populations. Random-effects models were used to assess estimates from studies with significant heterogeneities.

Results: Overall, 12 studies concerning GLUT 1 and 2 studies concerning GLUT 3, which involved 2008 participants when combined, were included in this analysis. We found that overexpression of GLUTs were significantly correlated to poorer survival rates (HR=1.63, 95%CI=1.09-2.44 and HR=1.89, 95%CI=1.28-2.81). In the subgroup analysis, the GLUT 1 up-regulation was correlated with negative overall survival in pancreatic cancer and gastric cancer and with better overall survival in colorectal cancer. In addition, overexpression of GLUT 1 was associated with a poorer prognosis in the Asian population, while no significance was found in the non-Asian subgroup. However, limitations do exist, which could be handled better.

Conclusions: A combination of GLUTs 1 and 3 might help predict malignancy of cancers and direct effective cancer therapy.

Citing Articles

Rg3-lipo biomimetic delivery of paclitaxel enhances targeting of tumors and myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

Shen Y, Zhong B, Zheng W, Wang D, Chen L, Song H J Clin Invest. 2024; 134(22).

PMID: 39545407 PMC: 11563678. DOI: 10.1172/JCI178617.


Oxidative stress regulation and related metabolic pathways in epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer stem cells.

Farahzadi R, Valipour B, Fathi E, Pirmoradi S, Molavi O, Montazersaheb S Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023; 14(1):342.

PMID: 38017510 PMC: 10685711. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-023-03571-6.


An Update on the Metabolic Landscape of Oncogenic Viruses.

Gaballah A, Bartosch B Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(23).

PMID: 36497226 PMC: 9738352. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235742.


Metabolic Pathways in Breast Cancer Reprograming: An Insight to Non-Coding RNAs.

Abedi-Gaballu F, Kamal Kazemi E, Salehzadeh S, Mansoori B, Eslami F, Emami A Cells. 2022; 11(19).

PMID: 36230935 PMC: 9563138. DOI: 10.3390/cells11192973.


MicroRNAs-mediated regulation of glucose transporter (GLUT) expression in glioblastoma.

Beylerli O, Sufianova G, Shumadalova A, Zhang D, Gareev I Noncoding RNA Res. 2022; 7(4):205-211.

PMID: 36157351 PMC: 9467858. DOI: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2022.09.001.


References
1.
Ramani P, Headford A, May M . GLUT1 protein expression correlates with unfavourable histologic category and high risk in patients with neuroblastic tumours. Virchows Arch. 2013; 462(2):203-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-012-1370-4. View

2.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M . Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014; 136(5):E359-86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210. View

3.
Chan D, Sutphin P, Nguyen P, Turcotte S, Lai E, Banh A . Targeting GLUT1 and the Warburg effect in renal cell carcinoma by chemical synthetic lethality. Sci Transl Med. 2011; 3(94):94ra70. PMC: 3683134. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002394. View

4.
Kallinowski F, Schlenger K, Runkel S, Kloes M, Stohrer M, Okunieff P . Blood flow, metabolism, cellular microenvironment, and growth rate of human tumor xenografts. Cancer Res. 1989; 49(14):3759-64. View

5.
Lastraioli E, Bencini L, Bianchini E, Romoli M, Crociani O, Giommoni E . hERG1 Channels and Glut-1 as Independent Prognostic Indicators of Worse Outcome in Stage I and II Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot Study. Transl Oncol. 2012; 5(2):105-12. PMC: 3323932. DOI: 10.1593/tlo.11250. View