» Articles » PMID: 28085054

Bioactive Nanocomposites for Tissue Repair and Regeneration: A Review

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2017 Jan 14
PMID 28085054
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This review presents scientific findings concerning the use of bioactive nanocomposites in the field of tissue repair and regeneration. Bioactivity is the ability of a material to incite a specific biological reaction, usually at the boundary of the material. Nanocomposites have been shown to be ideal bioactive materials due the many biological interfaces and structures operating at the nanoscale. This has resulted in many researchers investigating nanocomposites for use in bioapplications. Nanocomposites encompass a number of different structures, incorporating organic-inorganic, inorganic-inorganic and bioinorganic nanomaterials and based upon ceramic, metallic or polymeric materials. This enables a wide range of properties to be incorporated into nanocomposite materials, such as magnetic properties, MR imaging contrast or drug delivery, and even a combination of these properties. Much of the classical research was focused on bone regeneration, however, recent advances have enabled further use in soft tissue body sites too. Despite recent technological advances, more research is needed to further understand the long-term biocompatibility impact of the use of nanoparticles within the human body.

Citing Articles

Nanotherapeutic and Nano-Bio Interface for Regeneration and Healing.

Kumar R, Igwegbe C, Khandel S Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767834 PMC: 11673698. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122927.


Biocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Materials, Fabrication Techniques and Future Directions.

Sultana N, Cole A, Strachan F Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597399 PMC: 11595283. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225577.


Assessment of laser-synthesized Si nanoparticle effects on myoblast motility, proliferation and differentiation: towards potential tissue engineering applications.

Murru C, Duvert L, Magdinier F, Casanova A, Alloncle A, Testa S Nanoscale Adv. 2024; 6(8):2104-2112.

PMID: 38633050 PMC: 11019504. DOI: 10.1039/d3na01020a.


Comparative study of physical-chemical properties of bioactive glass ionomer cement.

Ramos N, Felizardo K, Berger S, Guiraldo R, Lopes M Braz Dent J. 2024; 35:e245728.

PMID: 38537023 PMC: 10976313. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202405728.


Nanomaterials Modulating the Fate of Dental-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Involved in Oral Tissue Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Li X, Wang Y, Huang D, Jiang Z, He Z, Luo M Int J Nanomedicine. 2023; 18:5377-5406.

PMID: 37753067 PMC: 10519211. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S418675.


References
1.
Marino A, Tonda-Turo C, De Pasquale D, Ruini F, Genchi G, Nitti S . Gelatin/nanoceria nanocomposite fibers as antioxidant scaffolds for neuronal regeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2016; 1861(2):386-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.11.022. View

2.
Usman A, Hussain Z, Riaz A, Khan A . Enhanced mechanical, thermal and antimicrobial properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide/starch/silver nanocomposites films. Carbohydr Polym. 2016; 153:592-599. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.026. View

3.
Novoselov K, Geim A, Morozov S, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S . Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004; 306(5696):666-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896. View

4.
Gupta A, Gupta M . Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(18):3995-4021. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012. View

5.
Liu S, Zeng T, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R . Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano. 2011; 5(9):6971-80. DOI: 10.1021/nn202451x. View