» Articles » PMID: 28078394

Kinematics of a Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Jan 13
PMID 28078394
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The recently reintroduced bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty (BCR TKA) is an interesting approach in the quest for close replication of knee joint biomechanics and kinematics closer to the native knee. Therefore, this study aimed at providing a detailed biomechanical view on the functional resemblance of BCR TKA to the native knee joint.

Methods: Seven fresh-frozen full leg cadaver specimens (76 ± 10 year) were mounted in a 6 degrees-of-freedom kinematic rig that applied a dynamic squatting motion knee flexion. Two motion patterns were performed pre- and post-implantation of a fixed bearing BCR TKA: passive flexion-extension and squatting while an infrared camera system tracked the location of reflective markers attached to the tibia and femur. Additionally, specimen laxity was assessed using Lachman tests and varus/valgus stress tests in triplicate.

Results: Overall, differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between native knee and BCR TKA were small. Some minor differences appeared under the load of a squat: less internal tibial rotation and some minor paradoxical anterior translation of the medial femoral condyle during mid-flexion. BCR TKA may slightly elevate the joint line. Knee laxity as measured by the Lachman and varus/valgus tests was not significantly influenced by BCR TKA implantation.

Conclusion: As both cruciate ligaments are preserved with BCR TKA the unloaded knee closely resembles native knee kinematics including preserving the rollback mechanism. The loss of the conforming anatomy of menisci and tibial cartilage and replacement via a relatively flat polyethylene inlay may account for the loss of tibial internal rotation and the slight paradoxical AP motion of the medial femoral condyle with BCR TKA. This phenomenon reproduces findings made earlier with fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Citing Articles

Histopathological Evaluation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients With Advanced Gonarthrosis.

Polat E, Gunaydin B, Karabag S, Heybeli N Int J Rheum Dis. 2025; 28(3):e70160.

PMID: 40040537 PMC: 11880999. DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.70160.


Sensitivity of Model-Based Predictions of Post-TKA Kinematic Behavior to Residual Errors in Ultrasound-Based Knee Collateral Ligament Strain Assessment.

Dandois F, Taylan O, Muller J, Scheys L Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(19).

PMID: 37837097 PMC: 10574986. DOI: 10.3390/s23198268.


Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty procedure reduced tensile force in the middle and posterior components of lateral collateral ligament during deep knee flexion activities with no effect on tensile force of the medial collateral ligament.

Kono K, Inui H, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Konda S, Taketomi S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(9):3889-3897.

PMID: 36928366 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07342-x.


Native knee kinematics is not reproduced after sensor guided cruciates substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Indelli P, Giuntoli M, Zepeda K, Ghirardelli S, Valtanen R, Iannotti F J Exp Orthop. 2023; 10(1):17.

PMID: 36786878 PMC: 9929011. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00567-2.


Fluoroscopic and radiostereometric analysis of a bicruciate-retaining versus a posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Mills K, Wymenga A, Benard M, Kaptein B, Defoort K, van Hellemondt G Bone Joint J. 2023; 105-B(1):35-46.

PMID: 36587259 PMC: 9948430. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B1.BJJ-2022-0465.R2.


References
1.
Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel P, Bellemans J . How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?. Knee. 2009; 16(5):358-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.01.001. View

2.
Komistek R, Allain J, Anderson D, Dennis D, Goutallier D . In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404):315-25. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00047. View

3.
Heyse T, Tucker S, Rajak Y, Kia M, Lipman J, Imhauser C . Frontal plane stability following UKA in a biomechanical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135(6):857-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2198-6. View

4.
Baumann F, Bahadin O, Krutsch W, Zellner J, Nerlich M, Angele P . Proprioception after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty is comparable to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 25(6):1697-1704. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4121-2. View

5.
Allaire R, Muriuki M, Gilbertson L, Harner C . Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(9):1922-31. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00748. View