ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway As an Alternative to Standard Endotracheal Tube in Securing Upper Airway in the Patients Undergoing Beating-heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Overview

Journal Ann Card Anaesth

Specialty Anesthesiology

Date 2017 Jan 12

PMID 28074798

Citations 5

Authors

Kalpana Shah

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: ProSeal laryngeal mask airways (PLMAs) are routinely used after failed tracheal intubation as airway rescue, facilitating tracheal intubation by acting as a conduit and to secure airway during emergencies. In long duration surgeries, use of endotracheal tube (ETT) is associated with various hemodynamic complications, which are minimally affected during PLMA use. However, except for few studies, there are no significant data available that promote the use of laryngeal mask during cardiac surgery. This prospective study was conducted with the objective of demonstrating the advantages of PLMA over ETT in the patients undergoing beating-heart coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

Methodology: This prospective, interventional study was carried out in 200 patients who underwent beating-heart CABG. Patients were randomized in equal numbers to either ETT group or PLMA group, and various hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were observed at different time points.

Results: Patients in PLMA group had mean systolic blood pressure 126.10 ± 5.31 mmHg compared to the patients of ETT group 143.75 ± 6.02 mmHg. Pulse rate in the PLMA group was less (74.52 ± 10.79 per min) (P < 0.05) compared to ETT group (81.72 ± 9.8). Thus, hemodynamic changes were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in PLMA than in ETT group. Respiratory parameters such as oxygen saturation, pressure CO 2 (pCO 2 ), peak airway pressure, and lung compliance were similar to ETT group at all evaluation times. The incidence of adverse events was also lower in PLMA group.

Conclusion: In experience hand, PLMA offers advantages over the ETT in airway management in the patients undergoing beating-heart CABG.

Citing Articles

Safety, Efficacy, and Ease of Insertion of Gnana Laryngeal Airway (GLA-4): A Prospective Clinical Study Utilizing the Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway With a Suction Tubing.

Ahmadzadeh S, Singh N, Sharpe M, Patel H, Lavespere G, Spillers N Cureus. 2024; 15(11):e49735.

PMID: 38161836 PMC: 10757590. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49735.

The effects of on hemodynamics, oxygen saturation, peak airway pressure and adverse events during anesthesia for thyroid surgery: tracheal intubation Vs. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.

Liao H, Chen L, Sheng C Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(4):2738-2744.

PMID: 34017436 PMC: 8129416.

Effect of Laryngeal Mask Air Way Insertion versus Endotracheal Intubation over Hemodynamic Responses in Pediatrics Patient Who Underwent Ophthalmic Surgery at Menelik II Hospital, Addis Ababa: A Prospective Observational Study Design.

Obsa M, Sholla A, Baraki B, Welde G, Gelgelu T, Kuruche M Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020; 2020:7021641.

PMID: 32565787 PMC: 7285405. DOI: 10.1155/2020/7021641.

Effects of Lidocaine Oropharyngeal Spray Applied Before Endotracheal Intubation on QT Dispersion in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Bilgi M, Velioglu Y, Yoldas H, Cosgun M, Yuksel A, Karagoz I Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 35(3):291-298.

PMID: 32549100 PMC: 7299595. DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0112.

Comparative study of the Ambu® AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in anesthesia airway management during neurosurgery.

Zhang Q, Sun Y, Wang B, Wang S, Mu F, Zhang Y J Int Med Res. 2020; 48(2):300060520902606.

PMID: 32036718 PMC: 7111043. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520902606.

References

Brimacombe J, Keller C . The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2003; 20(4):871-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8537(02)00044-5. View

Thompson J, HALL A, Russell J, Cagney B, Rowbotham D . Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1998; 80(4):467-9. DOI: 10.1093/bja/80.4.467. View

Bennett S, Grace D, Griffin S . Cardiovascular changes with the laryngeal mask airway in cardiac anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 92(6):885-7. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh149. View

Brain A, Verghese C, Strube P . The LMA 'ProSeal'--a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 84(5):650-4. DOI: 10.1093/bja/84.5.650. View

Helfman S, Gold M, deLisser E, Herrington C . Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation: lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol?. Anesth Analg. 1991; 72(4):482-6. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00011. View

Rieger A, Brunne B, Hass I, Brummer G, Spies C, Striebel H . Laryngo-pharyngeal complaints following laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1997; 9(1):42-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(96)00209-7. View

Cook T, Nolan J, Verghese C, Strube P, Lees M, MILLAR J . Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88(4):527-33. DOI: 10.1093/bja/88.4.527. View

Patki A . Laryngeal mask airway vs the endotracheal tube in paediatric airway management: A meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(5):537-41. PMC: 3237161. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.89900. View

Saraswat N, Kumar A, Mishra A, Gupta A, Saurabh G, Srivastava U . The comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(2):129-34. PMC: 3106384. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.79891. View

10.

Springer D, Jahr J . The laryngeal mask airway. Safety, efficacy, and current use. Am J Anesthesiol. 1995; 22(2):65-9. View

11.

Jamil S, Alam M, Usmani H, Khan M . A Study of the Use of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in Children and its Comparison with Endotracheal Intubation. Indian J Anaesth. 2010; 53(2):174-8. PMC: 2900102. View

12.

Fujii Y, Saitoh Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H . Cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation or LMA removal in children. Can J Anaesth. 1998; 45(2):178-81. DOI: 10.1007/BF03013260. View

13.

Gulec H, Cakan T, Yaman H, Kilinc A, Basar H . Comparison of hemodynamic and metabolic stress responses caused by endotracheal tube and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Res Med Sci. 2012; 17(2):148-53. PMC: 3525032. View

14.

McCoy E, Mirakhur R, McCloskey B . A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade. Anaesthesia. 1995; 50(11):943-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05924.x. View

15.

Braude N, Clements E, Hodges U, Andrews B . The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison with tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1989; 44(7):551-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11439.x. View

16.

Brimacombe J, Keller C . The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93(1):104-9. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200007000-00019. View

17.

Maltby J, Beriault M, Watson N, Liepert D, Fick G . The LMA-ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth. 2002; 49(8):857-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF03017420. View

18.

Lamb K, James M, Janicki P . The laryngeal mask airway for intraocular surgery: effects on intraocular pressure and stress responses. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 69(2):143-7. DOI: 10.1093/bja/69.2.143. View

19.

Evans N, Gardner S, James M, King J, Roux P, Bennett P . The proseal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88(4):534-9. DOI: 10.1093/bja/88.4.534. View

20.

Sinha A, Sharma B, Sood J . ProSeal as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in pediatric laparoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007; 17(4):327-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02127.x. View