» Articles » PMID: 2806449

The Influence of Target Distance on Eye Movement Responses During Vertical Linear Motion

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1989 Jan 1
PMID 2806449
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies of the linear vestibulo-ocular reflex (LVOR) suggest that eye movement responses to linear head motion are rudimentary. This may be due to inadequate control of target distance (D). As D approaches infinity, eye movements are not required to maintain retinal image stability during linear head displacements, but must become increasingly large as D shortens. The LVOR in the presence of visual targets (VLVOR) was tested by recording human vertical eye and head movements during self-generated vertical linear oscillation (averaging 2.7 Hz at peak excursion of 3.2 cm) while subjects alternately fixated targets at D = 36, 142, and 424 cm. Response sensitivity rose from 0.10 deg/cm (5.8 deg/s/g) for D = 424 cm to 0.65 deg/cm (37.5 deg/s/g) for D = 36 cm. Results employing optical manipulations, including spherical lenses to modify accommodation and accommodative convergence, and prisms to modify fusional vergence without altering accommodation, imply that the state of vergence is the most important variable underlying the effect. Trials in darkness (LVOR) and with head-fixed targets (visual suppression of the LVOR) suggest that, while visual following and perhaps "mental set" influences results, the major proportion of the VLVOR response is driven by vestibular (presumably otolith) inputs.

Citing Articles

Development of a new method for assessing otolith function in mice using three-dimensional binocular analysis of the otolith-ocular reflex.

Harada S, Imai T, Takimoto Y, Ohta Y, Sato T, Kamakura T Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):17191.

PMID: 34433883 PMC: 8387381. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96596-x.


The Contributions of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Acoustic Vestibular Stimulation to Our Understanding of the Vestibular System.

Rosengren S, Colebatch J Front Neurol. 2018; 9:481.

PMID: 30013504 PMC: 6037197. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00481.


Reading from a Head-Fixed Display during Walking: Adverse Effects of Gaze Stabilization Mechanisms.

Borg O, Casanova R, Bootsma R PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0129902.

PMID: 26053622 PMC: 4460068. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129902.


The visual input to the retina during natural head-free fixation.

Aytekin M, Victor J, Rucci M J Neurosci. 2014; 34(38):12701-15.

PMID: 25232108 PMC: 4166157. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0229-14.2014.


Scaling of compensatory eye movements during translations: virtual versus real depth.

Dits J, King W, van der Steen J Neuroscience. 2013; 246:73-81.

PMID: 23639883 PMC: 3691287. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.029.


References
1.
Miles F, Kawano K, Optican L . Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input. J Neurophysiol. 1986; 56(5):1321-54. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.5.1321. View

2.
Baarsma E, COLLEWIJN H . Eye movements due to linear accelerations in the rabbit. J Physiol. 1975; 245(1):227-47. PMC: 1330852. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010842. View

3.
NIVEN J, HIXSON W, Correia M . Elicitation of horizontal nystagmus by periodic linear acceleration. Acta Otolaryngol. 1966; 62(4):429-41. DOI: 10.3109/00016486609119587. View

4.
Bronstein A, Gresty M . Short latency compensatory eye movement responses to transient linear head acceleration: a specific function of the otolith-ocular reflex. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 71(2):406-10. DOI: 10.1007/BF00247500. View

5.
Viirre E, Tweed D, Milner K, Vilis T . A reexamination of the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex. J Neurophysiol. 1986; 56(2):439-50. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.2.439. View