» Articles » PMID: 23639883

Scaling of Compensatory Eye Movements During Translations: Virtual Versus Real Depth

Overview
Journal Neuroscience
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 May 4
PMID 23639883
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vestibulo-ocular reflexes are the fastest compensatory reflex systems. One of these is the translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (TVOR) which stabilizes the gaze at a given fixation point during whole body translations. For a proper response of the TVOR the eyes have to counter rotate in the head with a velocity that is inversely scaled to viewing distance of the target. It is generally assumed that scaling of the TVOR is automatically coupled to vergence angle at the brainstem level. However, different lines of evidence also argue that in humans scaling of the TVOR also depends on a mechanism that pre-sets gain on a priori knowledge of target distance. To discriminate between these two possibilities we used a real target paradigm with vergence angle coupled to distance and a virtual target paradigm with vergence angle dissociated from target distance. We compared TVOR responses in six subjects who underwent lateral sinusoidal whole-body translations at 1 and 2 Hz. Real targets varied between distance of 50 and 22.4 cm in front of the subjects, whereas the virtual targets consisting of a green and red light emitting diode (LED) were physically located at 50 cm from the subject. Red and green LED's were dichoptically viewed. By shifting the red LED relative to the green LED we created a range of virtual viewing distances where vergence angle changed but the ideal kinematic eye velocity was always the same. Eye velocity data recorded with virtual targets were compared to eye velocity data recorded with real targets. We also used flashing targets (flash frequency 1 Hz, duration 5 ms). During the real, continuous visible targets condition scaling of compensatory eye velocity with vergence angle was nearly perfect. During viewing of virtual targets, and with flashed targets compensatory eye velocity only weakly correlated to vergence angle, indicating that vergence angle is only partially coupled to compensatory eye velocity during translation. Our data suggest that in humans vergence angle as a measure of target distance estimation has only limited use for automatic TVOR scaling.

Citing Articles

The influence of target distance on perceptual self-motion thresholds and the vestibulo-ocular reflex during interaural translation.

King S, Benoit C, Bandealy N, Karmali F Prog Brain Res. 2019; 248:197-208.

PMID: 31239132 PMC: 9103442. DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.04.037.

References
1.
Angelaki D, Zhou H, Wei M . Foveal versus full-field visual stabilization strategies for translational and rotational head movements. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(4):1104-8. PMC: 6742246. View

2.
Wang X, Zhang M, Cohen I, Goldberg M . The proprioceptive representation of eye position in monkey primary somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10(5):640-6. DOI: 10.1038/nn1878. View

3.
Gamlin P, Yoon K . An area for vergence eye movement in primate frontal cortex. Nature. 2000; 407(6807):1003-7. DOI: 10.1038/35039506. View

4.
Viirre E, Demer J . The human vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex during combined linear and angular acceleration with near-target fixation. Exp Brain Res. 1996; 112(2):313-24. DOI: 10.1007/BF00227649. View

5.
Clement G, Maciel F . Adjustment of the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain as a function of perceived target distance in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2004; 366(2):115-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.022. View