» Articles » PMID: 28053509

Involvement of the End User: Exploration of Older People's Needs and Preferences for a Wearable Fall Detection Device - a Qualitative Descriptive Study

Overview
Date 2017 Jan 6
PMID 28053509
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To explore the needs and preferences of community-dwelling older people, by involving them in the device design and mock-up development stage of a fall detection device, consisting of a body-worn sensor linked to a smartphone application.

Patients And Methods: A total of 22 community-dwelling persons 75 years of age and older were involved in the development of a fall detection device. Three semistructured focus group interviews were conducted. The interview data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis with deductive coding.

Results: The mock-up of a waterproof, body-worn, automatic and manual alerting device, which served both as a day-time wearable sensor and a night-time wearable sensor, was welcomed. Changes should be considered regarding shape, color and size along with alternate ways of integrating the sensor with items already in use in daily life, such as jewelry and personal watches. The reliability of the sensor is key for the participants. Issues important to the alerting process were discussed, for instance, who should be contacted and why. Several participants were concerned with the mandatory use of the smartphone and assumed that it would be difficult to use. They criticized the limited distance between the sensor and the smartphone for reliable fall detection, as it might restrict activity and negatively influence their degree of independence in daily life.

Conclusion: This study supports that involving end users in the design and mock-up development stage is welcomed by older people and allows their needs and preferences concerning the fall detection device to be explored. Based on these findings, the development of a "need-driven" prototype is possible. As participants are doubtful regarding smartphone usage, careful training and support of community-dwelling older people during real field testing will be crucial.

Citing Articles

Home living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluation, and interpretations of various welfare technology: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

Pajalic Z, Olsen S, Hamre A, Strom B, Clausen C, Saplacan D Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024; 7:100470.

PMID: 38314397 PMC: 10834993. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100470.


Evaluating the usability of a co-designed power assisted exercise graphical user interface for people with stroke.

Young R, Sage K, Broom D, Hext A, Snowdon N, Smith C J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):95.

PMID: 37488564 PMC: 10364422. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01207-7.


Binary Sensors-Based Privacy-Preserved Activity Recognition of Elderly Living Alone Using an RNN.

Tan T, Badarch L, Zeng W, Gochoo M, Alnajjar F, Hsieh J Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(16).

PMID: 34450809 PMC: 8398125. DOI: 10.3390/s21165371.


Rationale and Methods of Evaluation for ACHO, A New Virtual Assistant to Improve Therapeutic Adherence in Rural Elderly Populations: A User-Driven Living Lab.

Luengo-Polo J, Conde-Caballero D, Rivero-Jimenez B, Ballesteros-Yanez I, Castillo-Sarmiento C, Mariano-Juarez L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(15).

PMID: 34360194 PMC: 8345470. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157904.


"I felt like a TRIO champion": end-user perspectives on their role as co-designers of multi-purpose technologies.

Agot K, Lutnick A, Shapley-Quinn M, Ahmed K, Okello T, van der Straten A Gates Open Res. 2021; 4:163.

PMID: 33870103 PMC: 8028846. DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13182.1.


References
1.
Hanley A, Silke C, Murphy J . Community-based health efforts for the prevention of falls in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2011; 6:19-25. PMC: 3066249. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S9489. View

2.
Shah S, Robinson I, AlShawi S . Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25(4):514-21. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309990328. View

3.
Shah S, Robinson I . Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007; 23(1):131-7. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307051677. View

4.
Johnston K, Grimmer-Somers K, Sutherland M . Perspectives on use of personal alarms by older fallers. Int J Gen Med. 2010; 3:231-7. PMC: 2934606. DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s12603. View

5.
Thilo F, Hurlimann B, Hahn S, Bilger S, Schols J, Halfens R . Involvement of older people in the development of fall detection systems: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2016; 16:42. PMC: 4750302. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-016-0216-3. View