» Articles » PMID: 19411947

User-centered Design and Interactive Health Technologies for Patients

Overview
Date 2009 May 5
PMID 19411947
Citations 221
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite recommendations that patients be involved in the design and testing of health technologies, few reports describe how to involve patients in systematic and meaningful ways to ensure that applications are customized to meet their needs. User-centered design is an approach that involves end users throughout the development process so that technologies support tasks, are easy to operate, and are of value to users. In this article, we provide an overview of user-centered design and use the development of Pocket Personal Assistant for Tracking Health (Pocket PATH) to illustrate how these principles and techniques were applied to involve patients in the development of this interactive health technology. Involving patient-users in the design and testing ensured functionality and usability, therefore increasing the likelihood of promoting the intended health outcomes.

Citing Articles

Saudi Electronic Caries Assessment Tool (SECAT) Development: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Alayadi H, Talakey A, Alessa T, Aldhalaan A Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(5).

PMID: 40077045 PMC: 11899405. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13050483.


Designing and developing a prescription digital therapeutic for at-home heart rate variability biofeedback to support and enhance patient outcomes in post-traumatic stress disorder treatment.

Macy R, Somanji F, Sverdlov O Front Digit Health. 2025; 7:1503361.

PMID: 40007643 PMC: 11850387. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1503361.


A user-centred website to support advance care planning for people with dementia and their family caregivers: Development and usability study.

Monnet F, Dupont C, Pivodic L, Smets T, De Vleminck A, Van Audenhove C Digit Health. 2025; 11:20552076241304018.

PMID: 39991741 PMC: 11843698. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241304018.


e-Health applications for outpatient professional pharmaceutical care services: A scoping review.

Agudelo R, Pereanez J, Munoz S, Granados J, Ceballos M Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025; 17:100567.

PMID: 39926416 PMC: 11803173. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100567.


Usability and Usefulness of a Symptom Management Coaching System for Patients With Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.

Glaser S, Fraterman I, van Brummelen N, Tibollo V, Del Campo L, Mallo H JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e57659.

PMID: 39847771 PMC: 11803325. DOI: 10.2196/57659.


References
1.
Brennan P . Telehealth: bringing health care to the point of living. Med Care. 1999; 37(2):115-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00001. View

2.
Dabbs A, Hoffman L, Swigart V, Happ M, Dauber J, McCurry K . Striving for normalcy: symptoms and the threat of rejection after lung transplantation. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(7):1473-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.013. View

3.
Ahern D, Kreslake J, Phalen J . What is eHealth (6): perspectives on the evolution of eHealth research. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8(1):e4. PMC: 1550694. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8.1.e4. View

4.
Moen A, Brennan P . Health@Home: the work of health information management in the household (HIMH): implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12(6):648-56. PMC: 1294036. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1758. View

5.
Bartholomew L, Sockrider M, Abramson S, Swank P, Czyzewski D, Tortolero S . Partners in school asthma management: evaluation of a self-management program for children with asthma. J Sch Health. 2006; 76(6):283-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00113.x. View