» Articles » PMID: 2802547

Ciprofloxacin and Rifampin, Alone and in Combination, for Therapy of Experimental Staphylococcus Aureus Endocarditis

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1989 Aug 1
PMID 2802547
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The therapeutic activities of ciprofloxacin (25 mg/kg every 8 h), rifampin (10 mg/kg every 24 h), ciprofloxacin plus rifampin, and vancomycin (17.5 mg/kg every 6 h) were compared by using the rabbit model of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Animals infected with one of two test strains (SA1199 or SA487) were randomized into treatment groups and received 6 days of therapy. For SA1199, ciprofloxacin plus rifampin was most effective at reducing vegetation bacterial counts. For SA487, ciprofloxacin plus rifampin was as effective as vancomycin but less effective than ciprofloxacin alone. Resistance to ciprofloxacin at 5- and 10-fold the MIC emerged in the test strain in 82 and 55%, respectively, of rabbits infected with SA1199 and receiving ciprofloxacin monotherapy. The combination of ciprofloxacin and rifampin decreased these frequencies to 60% (P = 0.27) and 10% (P = 0.04). No resistance to ciprofloxacin was found in rabbits infected with SA487. We conclude that ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin plus rifampin are as efficacious as vancomycin in this model and that combining rifampin with ciprofloxacin may decrease the frequency at which high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin emerges. However, with respect to improved efficacy, the combination of ciprofloxacin and rifampin is unpredictable and may be detrimental.

Citing Articles

Comparing the Synergistic and Antagonistic Interactions of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin Combined with Rifampin against Drug-Resistant : A Time-Kill Assay.

Kang Y, Chung D, Ko J, Huh K, Cho S, Kang C Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37107077 PMC: 10135007. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040711.


Evaluating the Potential and Synergetic Effects of Microcins against Multidrug-Resistant .

Telhig S, Ben Said L, Torres C, Rebuffat S, Zirah S, Fliss I Microbiol Spectr. 2022; 10(3):e0275221.

PMID: 35543514 PMC: 9241698. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02752-21.


Pleiotropic Effects of Statins: New Therapeutic Approaches to Chronic, Recurrent Infection by .

Evans M, McDowell S Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(12).

PMID: 34959329 PMC: 8706520. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122047.


Oral switch versus standard intravenous antibiotic therapy in left-sided endocarditis due to susceptible staphylococci, streptococci or enterococci (RODEO): a protocol for two open-label randomised controlled trials.

Lemaignen A, Bernard L, Tattevin P, Bru J, Duval X, Hoen B BMJ Open. 2020; 10(7):e033540.

PMID: 32665381 PMC: 7365486. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033540.


Oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infective endocarditis: a systematic review.

Al-Omari A, Cameron D, Lee C, Corrales-Medina V BMC Infect Dis. 2014; 14:140.

PMID: 24624933 PMC: 4007569. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-140.


References
1.
Chin N, Neu H . Ciprofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compound active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984; 25(3):319-26. PMC: 185508. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.25.3.319. View

2.
Simon H, Yin E . Microbioassay of antimicrobial agents. Appl Microbiol. 1970; 19(4):573-9. PMC: 376740. DOI: 10.1128/am.19.4.573-579.1970. View

3.
Carpenter T, Hackbarth C, Chambers H, Sande M . Efficacy of ciprofloxacin for experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible or -resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986; 30(3):382-4. PMC: 180564. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.30.3.382. View

4.
Kaatz G, Barriere S, Schaberg D, FEKETY R . The emergence of resistance to ciprofloxacin during treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987; 20(5):753-8. DOI: 10.1093/jac/20.5.753. View

5.
BRYSON V, SZYBALSKI W . Microbial Selection. Science. 1952; 116(3003):45-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.116.3003.45. View