Are the EQ-5D-3L and the ICECAP-O Responsive Among Older Adults with Impaired Mobility? Evidence from the Vancouver Falls Prevention Cohort Study
Overview
Rehabilitation Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Preference-based generic measures are gaining increased use in mobility research to assess health-related quality of life and wellbeing. Hence, we examined the responsiveness of these two measures among individuals at risk of mobility impairment among adults aged ≥70 years.
Methods: We conducted a 12-month prospective cohort study of community-dwelling older adults (n = 288 to n = 341 depending on analysis) who were seen at the Vancouver Falls Prevention Clinic who had a history of at least one fall in the previous 12 months. We compared the responsiveness of the EuroQol-5 Domain-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) and the index of capability for older adults (ICECAP-O) by examining changes in these measures over time (i.e., over 6 and 12 months) and by examining whether their changes varied as a function of having experienced 2 or more falls over 6 and 12 months.
Results: Only the ICECAP-O showed a significant change over time from baseline through 12 months; however, neither measure showed change that exceeded the standard error of the mean. Both measures were responsive to falls that occurred during the first 6 months of the study (p < .05). These effects appeared to be amplified among individuals identified as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at baseline (p < .01). Additionally, the EQ-5D-3L was responsive among fallers who did not have MCI as well as individuals with MCI who did not fall (p < .05).
Conclusion: This study provides initial evidence suggesting that the EQ-5D-3L is generally more responsive, particularly during the first 6 months of falls tracking among older adults at risk of future mobility impairment.
Dams J, Gottschalk S, Schwenk M, Nerz C, Becker C, Klenk J BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):186.
PMID: 38395743 PMC: 10893703. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04802-y.
Gottschalk S, Konig H, Nejad M, Dams J Qual Life Res. 2022; 32(2):307-329.
PMID: 35915354 PMC: 9911506. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03185-0.
Chantanachai T, Taylor M, Lord S, Menant J, Delbaere K, Sachdev P PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13484.
PMID: 35663527 PMC: 9161814. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13484.
Feasibility of the EQ-5D in the elderly population: a systematic review of the literature.
Marten O, Brand L, Greiner W Qual Life Res. 2021; 31(6):1621-1637.
PMID: 34613597 PMC: 9098572. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03007-9.
Gade G, Jorgensen M, Ryg J, Masud T, Jakobsen L, Andersen S BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21(1):402.
PMID: 34193084 PMC: 8243769. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02346-z.