» Articles » PMID: 27993973

Anaplasma Marginale Outer Membrane Protein A Is an Adhesin That Recognizes Sialylated and Fucosylated Glycans and Functionally Depends on an Essential Binding Domain

Overview
Journal Infect Immun
Date 2016 Dec 21
PMID 27993973
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

causes bovine anaplasmosis, a debilitating and potentially fatal tick-borne infection of cattle. Because is an obligate intracellular organism, its adhesins that mediate entry into host cells are essential for survival. Here, we demonstrate that outer membrane protein A (AmOmpA; AM854) contributes to the invasion of mammalian and tick host cells. AmOmpA exhibits predicted structural homology to OmpA of (ApOmpA), an adhesin that uses key lysine and glycine residues to interact with α2,3-sialylated and α1,3-fucosylated glycan receptors, including 6-sulfo-sialyl Lewis x (6-sulfo-sLe). Antisera against AmOmpA or its predicted binding domain inhibits infection of host cells. Residues G55 and K58 are contributory, and K59 is essential for recombinant AmOmpA to bind to host cells. Enzymatic removal of α2,3-sialic acid and α1,3-fucose residues from host cell surfaces makes them less supportive of AmOmpA binding. AmOmpA is both an adhesin and an invasin, as coating inert beads with it confers adhesiveness and invasiveness. Recombinant forms of AmOmpA and ApOmpA competitively antagonize infection of host cells, but a monoclonal antibody against 6-sulfo-sLe fails to inhibit AmOmpA adhesion and infection. Thus, the two OmpA proteins bind related but structurally distinct receptors. This study provides a detailed understanding of AmOmpA function, identifies its essential residues that can be targeted by blocking antibody to reduce infection, and determines that it binds to one or more α2,3-sialylated and α1,3-fucosylated glycan receptors that are unique from those targeted by ApOmpA.

Citing Articles

Identification of adhesins for entry into tick cells using phage display.

Noh S, Ujczo J, Alperin D, Jarvis S, Solyman M, Koku R Infect Immun. 2024; 92(6):e0054023.

PMID: 38727242 PMC: 11237752. DOI: 10.1128/iai.00540-23.


Genomic characters of and genetic diversity in China.

Han X, Du L, Lin Z, Li C, Xiong T, Zhu W Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024; 13(1):2323153.

PMID: 38442029 PMC: 10916922. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2323153.


Acinetobacter baumannii outer membrane protein A induces autophagy in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells involving the PI3K/mTOR pathway.

Tan H, Cao L Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023; 11(4):e830.

PMID: 37102650 PMC: 10091376. DOI: 10.1002/iid3.830.


A Germin-Like Protein GLP1 of Legumes Mediates Symbiotic Nodulation by Interacting with an Outer Membrane Protein of Rhizobia.

Zeng X, Li D, Lv Y, Lu Y, Mei L, Zhou D Microbiol Spectr. 2023; 11(1):e0335022.

PMID: 36633436 PMC: 9927233. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03350-22.


Bovine Anaplasmosis: Will there ever be an almighty effective vaccine?.

Salinas-Estrella E, Amaro-Estrada I, Cobaxin-Cardenas M, Preciado de la Torre J, Rodriguez S Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:946545.

PMID: 36277070 PMC: 9581321. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.946545.


References
1.
Yamashita K, Kochibe N, Ohkura T, Ueda I, Kobata A . Fractionation of L-fucose-containing oligosaccharides on immobilized Aleuria aurantia lectin. J Biol Chem. 1985; 260(8):4688-93. View

2.
Hammac G, Pierle S, Cheng X, Scoles G, Brayton K . Global transcriptional analysis reveals surface remodeling of Anaplasma marginale in the tick vector. Parasit Vectors. 2014; 7:193. PMC: 4022386. DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-193. View

3.
Fukushima K, Hirota M, Terasaki P, Wakisaka A, Togashi H, Chia D . Characterization of sialosylated Lewisx as a new tumor-associated antigen. Cancer Res. 1984; 44(11):5279-85. View

4.
Carreno A, Alleman A, Barbet A, Palmer G, Noh S, Johnson C . In vivo endothelial cell infection by Anaplasma marginale. Vet Pathol. 2007; 44(1):116-8. DOI: 10.1354/vp.44-1-116. View

5.
Kelley L, Sternberg M . Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4(3):363-71. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.2. View