» Articles » PMID: 27993485

Racial Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Dec 21
PMID 27993485
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Many studies have suggested that disparities exist in the use of medical screening tests. The purpose of this study was to assess racial disparities in screening mammography in the United States via a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus for comparative studies published between 1946 and 2015 comparing utilization of mammography among various racial groups. Two independent reviewers extracted data and appraised study. Meta-analysis was conducted when appropriate using the random-effects model.

Results: A total of 5,818,380 patients were included across 39 relevant studies; 43.1% of patients were white, 33.3% were black, 17.4% were Hispanic, and 6.2% were Asian/Pacific Islander. Black and Hispanic populations had lower odds of utilizing screening mammography when compared with the white population (odds ratio [OR] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.91; I = 89.4% and OR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93, respectively). For African Americans, these disparities were present in both the 40 to 65 age group and the >65 age group; for Hispanics, these differences were present only in the 40 to 65 age group. There was no difference in mammography utilization between Asians/Pacific Islanders and whites (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 0.09-38.41).

Conclusions: Racial disparities in utilization of screening mammography are evident in black and Hispanic populations in the United States. Further studies are needed to understand reasons for disparities, trends over time, and the effectiveness of interventions targeting these disparities.

Citing Articles

Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening.

Weller S, Pappadis M, Krishnan S, Stearnes M, Sheffield K, Tan A medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974035 PMC: 11838665. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.30.25321380.


A Pilot Analysis of Patient Portal Use and Breast Cancer Screening Among Black Patients in a Large Academic Health System.

Marcotte L, Khor S, Wong E, Akinsoto N, Lee E, Onstad S AJPM Focus. 2025; 4(1):100305.

PMID: 39866156 PMC: 11758112. DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100305.


Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Gilchrist A, Fernando G, Holland P, Ahmed F PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314620.

PMID: 39700208 PMC: 11658587. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314620.


Assessing Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening Among BIPOC Populations in the Twin Cities.

Parvez M, DeGracia D, Larson K, Sager E J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024; .

PMID: 39636357 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02245-0.


Increasing screening for breast cancer using a randomized evaluation of electronic health record nudges: Design and rationale of the I-screen clinical trial.

Waddell K, Mehta S, Liao J, Linn K, Park S, Rhodes C Contemp Clin Trials. 2024; 148:107753.

PMID: 39581259 PMC: 11783373. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107753.