» Articles » PMID: 38416784

Examining Cancer Screening Disparities by Race/ethnicity and Insurance Groups: A Comparison of 2008 and 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Data in the United States

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Feb 28
PMID 38416784
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pervasive differences in cancer screening among race/ethnicity and insurance groups presents a challenge to achieving equitable healthcare access and health outcomes. However, the change in the magnitude of cancer screening disparities over time has not been thoroughly examined using recent public health survey data.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the 2008 and 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) database focused on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates among race/ethnicity and insurance groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between cancer screening rates, race/ethnicity, and insurance coverage, and to quantify the changes in disparities in 2008 and 2018, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Colorectal cancer screening rates increased for all groups, but cervical and mammogram rates remained stagnant for specific groups. Non-Hispanic Asians continued to report consistently lower odds of receiving cervical tests (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.32-0.55, p<0.001) and colorectal cancer screening (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42-0.72, p<0.001) compared to non-Hispanic Whites in 2018, despite significant improvements since 2008. Non-Hispanic Blacks continued to report higher odds of recent cervical cancer screening (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.47-2.68, p<0.001) and mammograms (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-1.71, p<0.05) than non-Hispanic Whites in 2018, consistent with higher odds observed in 2008. Hispanic individuals reported improved colorectal cancer screening over time, with no significant difference compared to non-Hispanics Whites in 2018, despite reporting lower odds in 2008. The uninsured status was associated with significantly lower odds of cancer screening than private insurance for all three cancers in 2008 and 2018.

Conclusion: Despite an overall increase in breast and colorectal cancer screening rates between 2008 and 2018, persistent racial/ethnic and insurance disparities exist among race/ethnicity and insurance groups. These findings highlight the importance of addressing underlying factors contributing to disparities among underserved populations and developing corresponding interventions.

Citing Articles

Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review.

Perron M, Hudon C, Roux-Levy P, Poitras M BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):390.

PMID: 39501147 PMC: 11536959. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02633-9.

References
1.
Schpero W, Ndumele C . Medicaid Disenrollment After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding a New Crisis. JAMA Health Forum. 2022; 3(2):e214743. DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4743. View

2.
Sentell T, Braun K, Davis J, Davis T . Health literacy and meeting breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines among Asians and whites in California. Springerplus. 2015; 4:432. PMC: 4540711. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1225-y. View

3.
Curtin L, Klein R . Direct standardization (age-adjusted death rates). Healthy People 2000 Stat Notes. 1995; (6):1-10. View

4.
Wee C, McCarthy E, Davis R, Phillips R . Obesity and breast cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19(4):324-31. PMC: 1492197. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30354.x. View

5.
Suk R, Hong Y, Rajan S, Xie Z, Zhu Y, Spencer J . Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline-Concordant Cervical Cancer Screening Rates and Reasons for Underscreening by Age, Race and Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Rurality, and Insurance, 2005 to 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(1):e2143582. PMC: 8767443. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43582. View